chuck franklin said:
2 things. i am on the sox clearly for the value and garcia during the day. and how anyone can lay -170 with oakland over the angels is beyond me. this is a terrible play - even if it wins. laying this much to the angels? NOT ME! at this price - you either take the A's on the R/L and make them +125ish or you take the angels at this price.
hell of a phillies win last night bigshott
yes winkyduck -170 is alot higher juice than we normally lay so i agree with your statement there is value with angels tonight however i am wagering on zito over santana and the only time i wager on runlines is with road teams in cincinnatti,colorado,or texas.
yes winkyduck -170 is alot higher juice than we normally lay so i agree with your statement there is value with angels tonight however i am wagering on zito over santana and the only time i wager on runlines is with road teams in cincinnatti,colorado,or texas.
good win on sox winkyduck again bernie williams cost the yankees he is just over the hill cant run down flyballs the ball hit to end the game by cano would have been a rbi double for the sox. sox flexed their muscles winning 2 of 3 so far stopping the yankees bats.
gonna be a 0-2 start on this side of town and a guranteed losing day might has well sit back and have a few :drink:
gonna be a 0-2 start on this side of town and a guranteed losing day might has well sit back and have a few :drink:
