US has until April 2006 to respect Internet gambling ruling: WTO

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
[size=+1]US has until April 2006 to respect Internet gambling ruling: WTO[/size]
<SMALL>AFP ^ | 08/19/05</SMALL>


GENEVA (AFP) - The United States has until April 2006 to comply with a ruling about US restrictions on cross-border gaming on the Internet, the World Trade Organisation announced.

In an arbitration decision, the global trade referee set the "reasonable period of time" for Washington to adapt its legislation in line with the ruling, which was issued in April this year after the tiny Caribbean state of Antigua and Barbuda brought the US before the 148-nation WTO.

"The United States has already announced its intention to comply with the WTO findings," said Neena Moorjani, a spokeswoman for the US Trade Representative, in a statement.

"In order to implement the findings, all we need to do is clarify one narrow issue concerning Internet gambling on horse racing."

"This does not involve weakening US restrictions on Internet gambling," she added.

Antigua argued in the complaint it launched in March 2003 that US prohibitions were harming its online gaming business, which is aimed at reducing the island's economic dependence on tourism.

Antigua, with a population of about 68,000, is a centre for offshore Internet gaming operations, attracting large numbers of US residents to its virtual casino-style games and betting services.

US officials contended Internet gambling is illegal if it involves activity on US soil, and have vowed to prosecute those involved in the practice.

Both sides claimed victory in the dispute.

In its ruling, the WTO accepted that prohibitions in some US states on cross-border gaming were valid and agreed with Washington's argument that some federal laws could "protect public morals or maintain public order."

However, the appeals panel ruled that the United States had not been able to show that US laws on horse-racing bets were applied equitably to foreign and domestic online betting suppliers, a key condition of global trade rules. Antigua has said it expects changes in US rules to unlock opportunities to advertise online gaming products on US Internet sites or media without the threat of legal action by authorities.


<HR noShade SIZE=1>
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
3,873
Tokens
what is this saying? i am new to the online sportsbook deal, and have been wondering all the fuzzy laws that may apply. what is the us trying to do, and what does that mean to us? thanks for anyone who wants to fill me in...
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
3,873
Tokens
a second question: does the us gov view online betting (sportsbooks) different that all the online casinos and online poker sites?
 

I'll be in the Bar..With my head on the Bar
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
9,980
Tokens
looks to me like it will result in the offshores being able to advertise here again, be able to use U.S. processing companies, not have to worry about having their funds confiscated in U.S. banks, etc....BUT it would still give the U.S. the right to outlaw a site being on U.S. soil.....

ALSO they want the U.S. to decide if horse wagering is legal or not..because if it is then they believe the offshores should have EVERY right any U.S. company would have in the same enterprise..including operating from U.S. soil...horse wagering only of course.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
170
Tokens
the ban on advertising is sort of extra-legal. I don't think WTO rulings will effect it, as if Bush cares a whit for International

It was accomplished by heavy handed harassment of advertizers via subpeanas and other harassment techniques. No one has ever been prosecuted for advertizing offshore gambling and the Feds like it that way - an actual prosecution would allow the actual court system to rule on whether the practice is legal or not.

You know how the Bush administration got around the Geneva Convention by defining POWs as "foreign combatants?" Off shore bookies are in the same category. When the current administration has a "values" or terrorism agenda, its Forget the Constitution, and Geneva who? At least so far, no bookies have been sent to Saudi Arabia for torture.
Uh Oh, anyone heard from Jay C recently?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,739
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com