8 Winning MLB System Plays - 08.31.05

August 31st 2005
---------------------------------------
<b>System #1</b>
When ANY MLB team played as Home team as a Favorite - 3rd game of a series - Coming off a Home win as a Favorite - Last 5 years.
<b>outcome:</b> The Home Favorite is 954-633-0 SU the last 5 years. (San Diego)

<b>System #2</b>
When ANY MLB team played as a Home team - Total is 8.5 - Vs NL WEST opponent - Last 3 years.
<b>outcome:</b> The Home Team is 158-103-0 SU the last 3 years. (San Francisco)

<b>System #3</b>
When ANY MLB team played as a -160 to -180 Home Favorite - Last 3 years.
<b>outcome:</b> The Home Favorite is 700-433-0 SU the last 3 years. (NYM)

<b>System #4</b>
When ANY MLB team played as Road team as a Favorite - Total is 9.0 - Last 2 years.
<b>outcome:</b> The Road Favorite is 222-138-0 SU the last 2 years. (Minnesota)

<b>System #5</b>
When ANY MLB team played as Home team as a Favorite - Total is between 10.5 to 11.0 - 3rd game of a series - Coming off a 1 run lost.
<b>outcome:</b> The UNDER is 38u-19o-1p since '97. (Tampa Bay vs. Boston)

<b>System #6</b>
When ANY MLB team played as Road team as a Underdog - Vs. Left handed pitchers - Vs Division Opponent - Coming off 1 push.
<b>outcome:</b> The OVER is 37-23-7 since '97. (Baltimore - Toronto)

<b>System #7</b>
When ANY MLB team played as Home team as a Underdog - Total is 7.5 - Scored 8 or more runs in last game.
<b>outcome:</b> The OVER is 28-12-0 since '97. (NYY vs. Seattle)

<b>System #8</b>
When ANY MLB team played as a 100 to 120 Road Underdog - Total is 8.0 - Coming off a 1 run lost.
<b>outcome:</b> The UNDER is 42u-27o-6p since '97. (Oakland - L.A.A.)

Good luck.

Ron

i like these systems, have a couple similiar!


good luck, ga

System 8 doesn't apply because Oakland won by 1 run not lost by 1 run but like under also,

Good catch Kojak....here's the new revised system on this game.

When ANY MLB team played as a 100 to 120 Road Underdog - Total is 8.0 - Coming off a 1 run win

The UNDER is 25u-18o-6p since '97. Not as nice, but still a lean to the under nevertheless.

Ron