Are more and more books going to the Amount to WIN as the rollover for bonuses??

Search

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
If you bet 300 to win 150 they amount of rollover at some books is 150 not 300 is this a growing trend when you take a bonus???

I have noticed this starting to be in the rules at more and more books


thoughts???
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
If that's true, it's a lot of BS. What you are RISKING is the only thing to be considered. I'm sure if it was the other way around, and you wagered $100 to win $200, and you won they aren't going to credit you for $200!
 

Home of the Cincinnati Criminals.
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,500
Tokens
god i hope not, but looks like it......trojan does, and that is the only negative i can say about that book, which is good.

BB
Dante said:
If you bet 300 to win 150 they amount of rollover at some books is 150 not 300 is this a growing trend when you take a bonus???

I have noticed this starting to be in the rules at more and more books


thoughts???
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
I notice trojan and 777rock does also that is why I started to noticed
 

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
maybe the second rate books are .. i doubt a top shop would resort to that.

it is flat out wrong if thats their rule..
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Tokens
Its total bullshit. A SHIT book move. BTW, Its the lowest amount of the wager, risk or win.

Nice start for Trojan sportsbook. Screws over the bettor by shortcahnging them on the small change, and then the bullshit rollover. So if I put $300 in action and win $50, only the $50 counts toward the rollover. Thats a BetUs move.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
987
Tokens
It's just a form of deceptive marketing. The rollover is normally calculated by adding up the amount of money risked by the player. All bets that are offered have a house hold, so it shouldn't matter.

All it does is make the true effective rollover higher and allow them to advertise the lower number through the use of fine print.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
472
Tokens
The hold isn't the same - if you play a -1000 ML (take back +800) the hold is only 2%. As the moneylines get higher, you either have ridiculous looking numbers, or a lower hold.

I thought every book used the lesser of risk/win amount, but it has never been an issue for me (I only play at places that offer something good; I'll keep playing there even after rollover is met)
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
I do not see anything wrong with it ...if they state it upfront you can choose to play there or not play there.....does not make them a SHIT book
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
987
Tokens
daringly said:
The hold isn't the same - if you play a -1000 ML (take back +800) the hold is only 2%. As the moneylines get higher, you either have ridiculous looking numbers, or a lower hold.

I thought every book used the lesser of risk/win amount, but it has never been an issue for me (I only play at places that offer something good; I'll keep playing there even after rollover is met)

You are correct that the hold changes as the line moves up, but that's why the spread widens to offset it.

Rollover is understood to be the amount of times you wager the deposit plus the bonus. To do it any other way requires fine print. Why don't they just give a higher rollover requirement and spare you the fine print?

Answer: It doesn't sound as attractive.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 16, 2005
Messages
675
Tokens
Ok, JayC but somehow you have to fight with bonus abusers. I can imagine wagering 3-5 x deposit + bonus on a game like recent Spain vs San Marino in soccer (ml was -10,000)and getting away with the bonus. As long as it is stated CLEARLY I'm OK with it
 

New member
Joined
Nov 9, 2004
Messages
416
Tokens
I was recently speaking to Heritage and they also said they use the "base amount" of bets for the rollover on their sign-up bonuses. Sportbet is another book that does that.

There are also books that won't count bets over certain odds towards the rollover. Like Royal won't count bets of over -260 (or something like that).

I don't have any particular problem with them doing that; it just seems weird to me. It's like they are trying to discourage people laying chalk. If I was a book, I would want all the chalk-layers I could get my hands on.
 

International Playa
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
10,183
Tokens
Dante said:
I do not see anything wrong with it ...if they state it upfront you can choose to play there or not play there.....does not make them a SHIT book

makes it a shit book imo.........
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
987
Tokens
szlem said:
Ok, JayC but somehow you have to fight with bonus abusers. I can imagine wagering 3-5 x deposit + bonus on a game like recent Spain vs San Marino in soccer (ml was -10,000)and getting away with the bonus. As long as it is stated CLEARLY I'm OK with it

You make it sound like the player can't lose that bet. That bet has a theoretical hols to the house, otherwise they would not offer it. That's why it should count.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
210
Tokens
In our defense, we do it based on the wager amount. Which yes does happen to be the smaller amount always. But it's not based on "the smallest amount" it's "the wager amount" ad clearly stated on our rules page. No hidden rules here. Dog players would have a fit if we did it by win risk amounts but they are usually more educated in the gaming business. You can't always please every player.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

With 20% and a 5x rollover if with the wager amount being counted towards the rollover. If you go 50% you are still up on us. I think there is nothing unfair about that. We are still a business and honestly right now, we are exposed.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p></o:p>

Mike
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,633
Messages
13,453,115
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com