I know this may seem odd to some of you but I Like to bet teams that have a negative turnver ratio. If they are a below average NFL team(not horrible, with bad qb) or better I think it is a positve when looking for a team that has not caught alot of breaks. The reason I say this is I know that some handicappers like Ace-Ace(don't get me wrong, not bashing him) use this stat the complete opposite of me. I like to think things will even out and some teams have had some unlucky bounces. I have heard Fezzik and Phil Steele say the same thing that most times a negative turnover ratio is not a negative stat. I just think this is one stat that is misleading. Wondering how some of you guys feel about this.
don't have data on it. My point is people over-react to wins and losses. I just think when looking at a game that a team lost from the previous week with a -3 turnover ratio I wouldn't hold that aganist them or the team that won(+3 turnover ratio) will in my opinon be over-valued by the public. They can't be expected to catch these breaks in the long run and I don't think the public handles these stats the right way.sherman said:
