Just curious, why does he only have 35 plays thus far? How does he determine when to actually bet on a game?
I play NCAA and Madden on XBox and there are a lot of holes when compared to reality. I'm still waiting for the game that is "very close" to reality. For instance, I can take Air Force in NCAA foots and go AT LEAST 10-2, maybe even 12-0 (all running plays except 3rd and longs, control the clock, solid defense). If the game was "air tight", I would not be able to do this. I realize that you're talking about a simulated game with no player interaction, but still.......if there are holes in one area, there's gotta be holes throughout. I couldn't bring myself to put money on the results, but congrats to your friend on a winning season!
I play NCAA and Madden on XBox and there are a lot of holes when compared to reality. I'm still waiting for the game that is "very close" to reality. For instance, I can take Air Force in NCAA foots and go AT LEAST 10-2, maybe even 12-0 (all running plays except 3rd and longs, control the clock, solid defense). If the game was "air tight", I would not be able to do this. I realize that you're talking about a simulated game with no player interaction, but still.......if there are holes in one area, there's gotta be holes throughout. I couldn't bring myself to put money on the results, but congrats to your friend on a winning season!
As erie as it is the artificial intelligence inthese games is remarkably accurate
Predicted score: Fresno St. 28 Boise St. 10
Actual score Fresno S.t 27 Boise St. 7
Did'nt the crew at FOX do this before the TB and Oakland Superbowl and the game had predicted the final plays as well as the winning team (TB):drink:
Predicted score: Fresno St. 28 Boise St. 10
Actual score Fresno S.t 27 Boise St. 7
Did'nt the crew at FOX do this before the TB and Oakland Superbowl and the game had predicted the final plays as well as the winning team (TB):drink:
