Why is the racist thread allowed to stay in the football forum?

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,309
Tokens
Are you going to allow theRX to stoop to this level?

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=321102:monsters-

Terrible Owens isnt the problem with this underachieving bunch.It all falls on the Eagles having a black quarterback.Plain and simple, thats why they suck.Now, call me a racist but the numbers speak for themselves.How many Afro-American QB's have led theire respective teams to a win in the Superbowl? NONE!!!- And dont say Doug Williams because he was a backup that came in for that 1 game.Had he been the Redskins QB thru the season and playoffs, his true colors would of came shining thru and he woulda choked well before getting to the Big Game.So, you guys keep riding the Vicks' Dicks and see how far they get.No rings combined between the 2 is my prediction.Now it's true they are faster and more agile, but the fact is they are basically a step above a monkey.Look at all the prominent colored QBS and tell me what you see.Look at Vicks numbers so far in his career and tell me he's not overated.His athletic ability can let him drive all the way downfield but then his blackness oozes out and he throws a pick.It all goes back to the Slave days but thats for another thread.Just like in a boxing match you should always bet on the black guy, the same is true for a big football game except the opposite.Bet on the White (caucasion) QB.So T.O. can come back,the truth is, it just doesnt matter.It still boils down to Mcnabb being black.Dont get me wrong, I like him off the field.He's well spoken and seems like the type not to rob or steal.But he's still of African desent and thats going to be the Eagles problem until he retires.Thats how it is and somebody better have the balls to agree with the facts instead of bashing me and calling me a racist..
<!-- / message -->
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Rush Limbaugh so seldom stops in I guess they wanted to let him have his say!
 

Gunga galunga... gunga, gunga-galunga.
Joined
Jan 1, 2001
Messages
4,196
Tokens
Agree that this is classless and should be "rubber roomed"
 

sd2

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,928
Tokens
While few would agree with this poster, I'm inclined to believe that readers of these forums have the intelligence to decide for themselves whether to read it or not, after getting the general drift.

If someone at Rx is going to be a censor, who will it be? What is his/her biases? What areas are going to be censored, and what are not? As of today, expressing racist views is still legal in the U.S. Just like expressing any other view that is not proscribed by law is legitimate. (But not of course falsely yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre.)

Some posters on this forum use the word "fuck," and other of the famous four-letter words. Some, even some bettors, may be offended by this phraseology. Want to censor them, because some may be offended? Again, it's not illegal to use such terms. And again, who shall be the Big Censor?

I don't read the political forum, but supposed someone there called Bush a warmongering idiot. (And given the diversity of views in any online forum, someone probably did.) Should that be censored because it may be contrued as not being patriotic, and supportive of the soldiers risking their lives in Iraq?

If the poster advocated some sort of illegal action, that would be a whole 'nother ballgame. But, like most others on these boards, he simply engaged in a "letting off steam" rant. If he came off as a fool, well, I'm sure we all have seemed a bit foolish in some of our rants.

I'm a little surprised that any regular user of this forum would suggest censorship. If you want to pay attention to the racist poster, write a stinging rebuttal. We can make up our own minds, thanks a lot!
 

Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2002
Messages
4,684
Tokens
CHOPTALK said:
Are you going to allow theRX to stoop to this level?

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=321102:monsters-

Terrible Owens isnt the problem with this underachieving bunch.It all falls on the Eagles having a black quarterback.Plain and simple, thats why they suck.Now, call me a racist but the numbers speak for themselves.How many Afro-American QB's have led theire respective teams to a win in the Superbowl? NONE!!!- And dont say Doug Williams because he was a backup that came in for that 1 game.Had he been the Redskins QB thru the season and playoffs, his true colors would of came shining thru and he woulda choked well before getting to the Big Game.So, you guys keep riding the Vicks' Dicks and see how far they get.No rings combined between the 2 is my prediction.Now it's true they are faster and more agile, but the fact is they are basically a step above a monkey.Look at all the prominent colored QBS and tell me what you see.Look at Vicks numbers so far in his career and tell me he's not overated.His athletic ability can let him drive all the way downfield but then his blackness oozes out and he throws a pick.It all goes back to the Slave days but thats for another thread.Just like in a boxing match you should always bet on the black guy, the same is true for a big football game except the opposite.Bet on the White (caucasion) QB.So T.O. can come back,the truth is, it just doesnt matter.It still boils down to Mcnabb being black.Dont get me wrong, I like him off the field.He's well spoken and seems like the type not to rob or steal.But he's still of African desent and thats going to be the Eagles problem until he retires.Thats how it is and somebody better have the balls to agree with the facts instead of bashing me and calling me a racist..
<!-- / message -->

Sorry but I agree. Black quarterbacks historically have been good runners with decent pocket presence but could never really throw the ball.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,309
Tokens
I guess alot of people had Philly last night.
 

sd2

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,928
Tokens
I had Philly, and the fucking Under, but that's not the point. If McNabb audibled the dumbest play thus far in this NFL season, than he is a Black Fool. And if Andy Reid called the play, he is a White Jackass.

Oh yeah, Herm Edwards is one of the better coaches in the NFL. Even Lombardi couldn't do anything with that MASH unit knows as the Jets. But that White Hackwriter out of Vegas, whatshizname, had the nerve to call Edwards the worst coach in the NFL a few weeks back. Secret racism, I imagine.

Half the teams in the NFL would like to have a healthy McNabb. But this play was befitting that warmongering idiot in the White House.
 

Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2002
Messages
4,684
Tokens
sd2 said:
While few would agree with this poster, I'm inclined to believe that readers of these forums have the intelligence to decide for themselves whether to read it or not, after getting the general drift.

If someone at Rx is going to be a censor, who will it be? What is his/her biases? What areas are going to be censored, and what are not? As of today, expressing racist views is still legal in the U.S. Just like expressing any other view that is not proscribed by law is legitimate. (But not of course falsely yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre.)

Some posters on this forum use the word "fuck," and other of the famous four-letter words. Some, even some bettors, may be offended by this phraseology. Want to censor them, because some may be offended? Again, it's not illegal to use such terms. And again, who shall be the Big Censor?

I don't read the political forum, but supposed someone there called Bush a warmongering idiot. (And given the diversity of views in any online forum, someone probably did.) Should that be censored because it may be contrued as not being patriotic, and supportive of the soldiers risking their lives in Iraq?

If the poster advocated some sort of illegal action, that would be a whole 'nother ballgame. But, like most others on these boards, he simply engaged in a "letting off steam" rant. If he came off as a fool, well, I'm sure we all have seemed a bit foolish in some of our rants.

I'm a little surprised that any regular user of this forum would suggest censorship. If you want to pay attention to the racist poster, write a stinging rebuttal. We can make up our own minds, thanks a lot!

I don't think it's racism so much as a statistical observation. Can you name a single Black quarterback that has thrown the ball well consistantly?

Could just be a coincidence.
 

Rx Post Doc
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
12,805
Tokens
Could also be that your sample size is less than 10!!! tulsa
 

sd2

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,928
Tokens
But there ARE black quarterbacks. NFL teams are not engaged in Affirmative Action. Maybe in the exec suites, but not on the field. Those black QBs in the NFL are there because they beat out their white competition.

I always thought that a McNabb who did not run would not be anywhere near as effective as one who did. But then, it's not really about passing, but about winning. If a qb can win games running more and passing less (a la Vick) that's all they want. Of course, untill one wins a Super Bowl with legs as well as arm the jury will remain out.

But if you're into statistics, how many black field goal kickers have there been in the NFL? Or even in college? (I recall Roby, but I think he was a punter, no?) And one would also think they'd be a lot more Hispanic kickers, given the great popularity of soccer in Latino countries. Cortez hangs on the fringes, a backup.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,633
Messages
13,453,115
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com