RobFunk said:I think this is why college sports are the easiest to beat for a lot of players.
Theres no way LVSC can have their head 100% in it for everything on the board every single day.
Just too many games.
Fishhead said:Oh how I wish that I had a passion for college basketball as I do college football.
:sad3: :sad3: :sad3:
For wiseguys that TRULLY LOVE this sport, it is a GOLDMINE, just for the simple reason you just stated.
RobFunk said:Ha. OMT that is admirable that you are trying to drum up Fishhead's interest in college hoops.
oldmanTED said:Rob:
College hoops is great stuff. Preseason tournaments. Regular season big games every week. Conference tournaments and March Madness. Just can't ask for more. I know Fish can get an interest. Just watch for awhile and it is addictive. I'd rather bet on college sports then pro sports anyday of the week.
Fishhead said:What hurts me is that I am so wrapped up into the NHL and football..............two sports that I like much more.
Again, do not dislike CBB, just not as passionate towards as two mentioned above.
Fishhead said:What hurts me is that I am so wrapped up into the NHL and football..............two sports that I like much more.
Again, do not dislike CBB, just not as passionate towards as two mentioned above.
sorry for asking what may seem like the obviousstuckinvegas said:For those that believe in using the 3rd game in four night, 4 games in 5 nights go against theory, here are the teams for tonight!
Pacers
Heat
Knicks
Pistons
Kings
Bulls
Agreed. Even with the Internet, it is very difficult to follow/research some of these teams.blue edwards said:why do people think that a huge schedule benefits the gamblers and is a disadvantage to the books? the books can't be sharp enough to make good lines but the players are sharp enough to survey the board and pick the winners? the books spend all their time doing this and most gamblers spend a few hours a week evaluating the games.
blue edwards said:why do people think that a huge schedule benefits the gamblers and is a disadvantage to the books? the books can't be sharp enough to make good lines but the players are sharp enough to survey the board and pick the winners? the books spend all their time doing this and most gamblers spend a few hours a week evaluating the games.
quantumleap said:I feel the bettor has the advantage if they pick just a few teams and really get to notice the trends of that team. Perhaps a team plays slowly and really guns it in the 2nd half (like San Antonio Spurs) or perhaps a team typically scores a lot in the 1st half and slows it down in the 2nd.
The linesmakers can't possibly get to know all the ins-and-outs of a team that a fan does if that fan doesn't get spread too thin. This has been working for me for Phoenix Suns 2nd-half totals. If a fan took interest in a lesser-known college team that fan would have the advantage over the linesmakers.