Just a discussion a friend and I were having...

PixWinns · Nov 20, 2005

Just a discussion a friend and I were having..

If you had $330.00 (just a figure), what would be the best way to wager with it?

Option 1: 3 games -110 / 100

Option 2: 1 game -330 / 300

Note, the wager would have to be placed all at one time, example 1:00 game start.

Which would be more beneficial?

Thanks,

TTinCO · Nov 20, 2005

I would definitely go with the 3 games. Regardless, if $300 is the bankroll, both scenarios are serious violations of anything resembling money mgmt.

hellah10 · Nov 20, 2005

option 1 for sure....

you give urself a few outs going that route

JudgeWapner · Nov 20, 2005

Depends on how strong my opinions on games were. Would rather bet 300 on a game I loved, rather than 100 on that and 100 on 2 I was luke warm about.

AC · Nov 20, 2005

klowinns said:
Just a discussion a friend and I were having..

If you had $330.00 (just a figure), what would be the best way to wager with it?

Option 1: 3 games -110 / 100

Option 2: 1 game -330 / 300

Note, the wager would have to be placed all at one time, example 1:00 game start.

Which would be more beneficial?

Thanks,

since we are throwin money mgmt out the window, what about three four team parlays...each would pay 1000. make sure to not overlap any teams

grnmax · Nov 20, 2005

What is your goal? If you want th best chance of doubling it, best chance is to bet it on one game. If you want to spread your risk, bet the three games. If you're going for the single biggest score, a parlay with ML underdogs.