Yep. On that review, the ref clearly stated that the receiver caught the ball and got both toes down, completed the catch, so the ruling of catch is confirmed. BeerDork says that "If the ruling on the field had been incomplete, it would not have been overturned." WHA??? The freakin' ref JUST SAID that it was a CATCH with BOTH TOES INBOUNDS. Hell of an analyst, he is.