Obviously none of you bet Chicago in the last clash, if you had you would have died a slow death. The Bears had everything going for them to cover, now their on the road. I wonder how many Green Bay players were saving themselves yesterday for this last clash. Of course on a completely different plain, the books know that there is enough mugs out there to take The Bears -7, good game bookmaking when youve got all these sharp players on your books :missingte
I believe the Pack was 2 yds. away from covering that game on the last play. Not sure GB has enough to keep this one as close(due to so many injuries), but that sure is a large # to give a division rival, with revenge, off a poor MNF outing, playing at home, when GB just about doubled their offensive output the first meeting.
Tough as it may be, I think I like the Pack at +7.
Tough as it may be, I think I like the Pack at +7.
Chuck Sims said:
Chuck,
Always good hearing from the you, a paramount of sensibility
Yes I realise they covered, I actually bet them, thats why I know the torture people went through and that was at home, it was an absolute Houdini. As for the spread I'm not so sure, as an ex Bookie its always easy to say the punters knocked it down, but in my experience its more the Books taking advantage.
