A question for everyone who bet Pittsburgh????? If the game were replayed...

Search

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
We have covered the fact this was one of the all time worst officiated games, no question, the entire world saw what took place.

The question for those who had money on Pittsburgh in the Super Bowl...

If the game was played again, would you bet Pitt -4?
 

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Tokens
No play here, but Big Ben couldn't have two bad games in a row.....Pitt by a TD.


God he was horrible too.......
 

To be the best, you have to beat the best
Joined
Oct 20, 2000
Messages
2,608
Tokens
Journeyman said:
We have covered the fact this was one of the all time worst officiated games, no question, the entire world saw what took place.

The question for those who had money on Pittsburgh in the Super Bowl...

If the game was played again, would you bet Pitt -4?

Many of the same people who are claiming that the officiating was fair or "wasn't that bad" would all bet Pitt again, as they would be in denial that the Seabags kicked their asses all over the field, save for 3 plays.

I'd take my chances on Seattle again, provided they don't forget about DJax.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
22,529
Tokens
if Seattle gets a an early TD or some other play it might have acted to wake up Pitt who played the worst possible game because they could get away with it. its not as easy to say Sea got screwed, as Pitt was dreadful and still beat Seattle with a big run and a long pass.

If seattle challenged them they might have woken up and actually played bit.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
8,135
Tokens
Seattle is better, showed it, and they would be getting +4 again? enough said
 

Cui servire est regnare
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
11,033
Tokens
Absolutely, AFC was the much better conference, bet it twice as much next time..
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
403
Tokens
Journeyman said:
If the game was played again, would you bet Pitt -4?

Like it never happened? Same officials? I would bet the Steelers, and I bet the Hawks last Sunday...

If this was a second game, like a rematch, I think I would have to take the Hawks...
 

AUB

Always buy the hook
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
153
Tokens
Embarassed to say so but I bet Seattle to win SU.

Seattle's entire coaching staff was flat and out coached. I feel that both teams were even on talent levels. Cowher and staff showed more poise and game control.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
3,293
Tokens
I would bet the Steelers again but double my bet. Big Ben would of had to have a better game. It would be easy money again. Just like the last 4 weeks.
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
nope the refs would just rig the entire thing again so no point
 

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Messages
7,267
Tokens
Gotta go with Holmgren and that Seahawks as the Ref's would surely let them have the best of this , cause there might be a "rubber" game, as then they would get to Ref 3 games and Triple whatever they found in the first one!! NFL slighty ahead of the Pro wrestling circuit..
 

Professional At All Times
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
42,732
Tokens
No! I wasn't that high on the Steelers to begin with and this game was nearly a no play for me anyway, so I would pass if they met again. Suspect the line might be more like 3 anyway.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
3,419
Tokens
Yes, Pitt would be money 8/10 times vs Seattle

Seattle couldnt stop Antwan Randel El from throwing a 30 yard TD pass on them!!!!!!

They couldnt catch the damn ball either. And they let up a 75 yard TD run.

They did not deserve to win that game and they didnt!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
2,574
Tokens
Refs were bad but Pitt mades plays and Seattle did not.

Pitt couldn't have played worse and yet still won by double digits.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
koidog said:
Refs were bad but Pitt mades plays and Seattle did not.

Pitt couldn't have played worse and yet still won by double digits.

How can you say that, the REFS were the reason Seattle did not make big plays, remember they made 4-5 big plays that were called back.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
The interception Ben threw at the goal line would not happen again if you ran tha play 20 times. Should have been another 7 for Pt.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
14,033
Tokens
yes

Would Bet It The Same Way In A Heart Beat.won 7500.00 On Pitt And 5000.00 On The Under As Posted.pitt Should Have Won By 20.

Theerodfather:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
1,191
Tokens
Why replay the game.

FINAL SCORE : PITTSBURGH 21 SEATTLE 10

SUPER BOWL XL CHAMPS: PITTSBURGH STEELERS.

ALL the crybabies need to get off the rag and go watch the game again. Pittsburgh got screwed more than Seattle in that game. 2 Seattle fumbles that Pittsburgh recovered were either overturned or not called.

The pass interference was just that PASS INTERFERENCE. READ THE RULES. If an offensive player pushes off the defender in order to make a catch its called pass interference. CORRECT CALL MADE.

The 15 yard penalty on Hasselback was called against Jeff Hartings earlier in the year. He dove through a block to make the tackle and was flagged just like Hasselback was. CORRECT CALL MADE.

The hold that would have put Seattle down on the 1 yard line was just that a hold. Go back and look at the CBS replay, the offensive lineman held the defender with his arm around the defenders shoulder. CORRECT CALL MADE. Anyone who doesnt know jack shit about football and heard the overrated fat ass Madden say it was a bad call is obviously going to jump on that. Did anyone see the NFL network after the game? The ex player who was the analyst (name is escaping me right now) said it was the correct call.

The only call that Seattle got screwed on was the Big Ben TD. I was shocked that they didnt reverse that. But lets not forget Pittsburgh would have had a 4th and goal from the 1 foot line if it was reversed. As Ben said last night on Letterman, they were preapared to go for it and as tall as he is the qb sneak would have worked very easily there.

All the whiners who think Seattle got screwed should be yelling at Holmgren and Hasselback for that putrid 2 minute drill at the end of the first half. How bout your kicker making a field goal. Granted they werent gimmies but his job is to make those kicks, especially in a game of this magnitude. Then Seattle cant stop Pittsburgh in the last 4 minutes when everyone on the planet knew that Pittsburgh was going to run the ball. How about telling your punter NOT TO KICK IT IN THE END ZONE 3 striaght times. How about telling your loud mouth TE to CATCH the ball and not DROP the ball 3 out of the 4 times it was thrown his way.

Pittsburgh won and Seattle lost and thats that. This board has become nothing but a bunch of whining little bitches. LET IT GO, ITS OVER, PITTSBURGH IS YOUR SUPER BOWL XL CHAMPIONS!!!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,527
Messages
13,452,320
Members
99,420
Latest member
slotsready
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com