Anybody Read The CNNSI Column Trashing Duke's NBA Players(Redick)? LOL

Search

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Well does this mean K is a greater coach, since he takes these players and gets the most out of them?

Duke has a lot of slower white stars too...Dunleavy, Alarie, Hurley, Laetner, Reddick, a the typical trait to be a great NBA player or good one even.

Brand, Johnny Dawkins, Deng (has great potential) Jason Williams (would have ben a great pro) Maggette (jury still out)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Coach K looks great because he gets 4 or 5 of the top 50 recruits each and every season. That is what it takes to look like a genius in colleges. Not so easy at other levels.

Reddick isn't as bad as advertised, that range and his tendency to vary his choices will keep him in the NBA awhile at least. Most of these guys who are great shooters can't create their own shot, but Reddick does because he isn't predictable. He takes a 25 footer one possession, then fakes a shot and drives for a 10 foot pull-up jumper next time down. Most of these college guys are one-trick ponies, especially the shooters, but Reddick and Morrison definitely have a lot of tricks in their bags.
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Messages
4,632
Tokens
I'd go on, but I've got to wrap things up. Cherokee Parks just showed up to deliver my pizza. Can I give him his own rookie card as a tip, or is that considered cheap?
:missingte:missingte:missingte
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
WildBill said:
Coach K looks great because he gets 4 or 5 of the top 50 recruits each and every season. That is what it takes to look like a genius in colleges. Not so easy at other levels.

Reddick isn't as bad as advertised, that range and his tendency to vary his choices will keep him in the NBA awhile at least. Most of these guys who are great shooters can't create their own shot, but Reddick does because he isn't predictable. He takes a 25 footer one possession, then fakes a shot and drives for a 10 foot pull-up jumper next time down. Most of these college guys are one-trick ponies, especially the shooters, but Reddick and Morrison definitely have a lot of tricks in their bags.

He didn't get those players when he first started at Duke, and the Duke program was not at the top of the ACC, Bill Foster took Duke to the finals in 1978 , after that Duke had slipped back into the middle of the ACC , it comes with the territory of winning year in and year out, no team has won like Duke has in K's time at Duke, no one is even close...obviously the guy does a helluva lot more right than almost any coach ever has.


p.s. I hate Duke.:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Journeyman said:
Well does this mean K is a greater coach, since he takes these players and gets the most out of them?

Getting kids to succeed in college is very different from getting kids ready for the NBA. We see these conflicts in the minor-leagues of baseball all the time - the minor league manager tries to win games while the big league club wants their prospects to develop. The Red Sox have now told the managers of their farm teams that developing talent is what they will be graded on - not wins/losses.

So if Duke kids don't make it in the NBA, we can say that K simply doesn't develop talent, but you can't blame him for it because he's not a farm club - he is paid to win games for Duke.

Think of any pro-sports team - now give them 5 of the top ten draft picks EVERY year. They will be what Duke is getting.

These days, USC is to college football what Duke is to basketball. I heard Carroll once say that their problem is not in trying to get a recruit to commit, but in getting the BEST 25 recruits from the pool of hundreds of players who are dying to go to USC.

That is college coaches can't succeed in the pro level. Rick Pitino was used to getting 3-4 Top 25 recruits every year at UK. He goes to the Celtics and now he's getting 1 out of 30 draft picks.

Winning on an even playing field is a lot more difficult than it seems.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
I just typed a small book out and went to send and lost it! grrr

Wanted to mention this too...John Wooden's players didn't make the greatest NBA players either.

Lew Alcinder and who else really? Bill Walton had a good career but didn't exactly live up to his potential (even though injuries killed him) Marques Johnson and Keith Wilkes and thats about it really, for all those titles you would think they would have more greats as well.

Duke has limitations with higher standards to get into Duke too, and not to mention his players graduate, it goes both ways...

Cincy , Duke does not get 5 of the top 10 players every year.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Journeyman said:
Cincy , Duke does not get 5 of the top 10 players every year.

I know, I was exagerrating - but you need to cut me some slack. :toast:

People here say they wagered 5 dimes, when they wager $25 so why can't I say 5 out of 10 if it's really 5 out of 30?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,689
Messages
13,453,439
Members
99,428
Latest member
callgirls
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com