Being a complete dope when it comes to Baseball ( some would say at all sports) I have given myself a crash course in the figures. The thing is, does in-running markets on exchanges distort the odds.
To make it easy, we have 2 equal teams, US odds 100 each. The old betting meant you were locked in until the end, so the odds made sense. However, accepting that a run = 100 EG, and the betting would go -200, +200 and the stats say its a 5/2 chance to score. Surely one would be getting value on the road team when availed to in-running betting as you have backed a 5/2 chance at no loss of price.
I also wonder about run lines being abused in certain situations, all of which makes today's bookmakers clueless as to why people are taking their odds. This also impacts on the nonsense of public money etc, so enjoyed by the blunt sharps. The betting game has just gone a notch higher and more complicated but as usual, winners get the money, losers sing the blues.
Any thoughts are most welcome except the public money mug angle where punters actually let others decide what they are betting, real sharp.:drink:
To make it easy, we have 2 equal teams, US odds 100 each. The old betting meant you were locked in until the end, so the odds made sense. However, accepting that a run = 100 EG, and the betting would go -200, +200 and the stats say its a 5/2 chance to score. Surely one would be getting value on the road team when availed to in-running betting as you have backed a 5/2 chance at no loss of price.
I also wonder about run lines being abused in certain situations, all of which makes today's bookmakers clueless as to why people are taking their odds. This also impacts on the nonsense of public money etc, so enjoyed by the blunt sharps. The betting game has just gone a notch higher and more complicated but as usual, winners get the money, losers sing the blues.
Any thoughts are most welcome except the public money mug angle where punters actually let others decide what they are betting, real sharp.:drink: