Who gets TO?

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
28,775
Tokens
Sounds like it's Denver, Miami or Dallas, with KC as a longshot. I think Shanahan is going to bring this misfit to Denver. Screw this team up so my Chiefs can win one for a change. Go Mike go.....you're going to want to kill him within a month.
 

Rx Post Doc
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
12,805
Tokens
I believe Dallas will sign him. I don't know if that is good or bad for the Cowboys, but I think they sign him.... just a guess, though.

I believe that whomever gets him gets a good deal and he turns his attitude around 180 degrees and they will be happy remembering the day they signed him. tulsa
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
That's what I think too. Dallas all the way.

Glenn, Keyshawn and TO? It is a pity that Bledsoe would be the guy to compliment that.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
28,775
Tokens
Tulsa said:
I believe that whomever gets him gets a good deal and he turns his attitude around 180 degrees and they will be happy remembering the day they signed him. tulsa

You better hope for a frontal lobot being in the contract. He'll screw up this chance just like the rest.
 

head turd in the outhouse
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
9,688
Tokens
Who would in their right mind want him on your team, like a train wreck, you know it's going to happen but you are paralyzed trying to stop it. I hope he signs with the denver donkeys as this will only help my lowly raiders try and finish out of last place this year!!!
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
TTinCO said:
You better hope for a frontal lobot being in the contract. He'll screw up this chance just like the rest.
Terry Glenn and Keyshawn were both problem players until they got to Dallas also. It would just make so much sense that TO ends up a Cowboy.

I will admit that niether Glenn or Key were half the attention whores that TO is. But they cant play like TO does.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Why get 3 receivers in Dallas? Stupid. Broncos could use him, but its getting late now as they have to keep Rod Smith one more season soon. Team who could really use him is San Diego, but I can't see that every happening.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
Bill, why is that stupid?

3 elite recievers, who do you cover? There will always be someone that is 1 on 1, you can not cover everybody. Whoever is one on one is going to make the catch 75% of the time. This is why having Drew spoils such a heaven like this.

Dal has a good running back, but now he is going to be that much more free to run because every defense would be out of their mind trying to cover those 3.

Set those guys up with Hasselbeck and Holmgren, they would probably score like 45 a game.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
This is the age of the salary cap Rob. If you are the Yankees then sure you get as many good players as you can, but this is the NFL and stupid moves like this cost you dearly. Elite receivers are hard to find, but for the same reasons you mentioned you can get a cheap guy out of college and he can get close to the same production as your 3rd guy. Before he got hurt Patrick Crayton was very productive for Dallas and comes a lot cheaper than gettting TO. Its just not a wise use of resources because receivers for the most part are easily interchangeable, especially once you get past the main guy. If you don't believe it, look at Arizona, two of the best playing there, the whole you can't cover them both is raised all the time. Where did it get them last year?
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,438
Tokens
The Cowboys are a well-behaved TO away from the SB, IMO, esp. in the hopelessly weak NFC.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,789
Members
99,403
Latest member
dgtlmkt.lyncotek
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com