If you go into a marriage and you have assets you'd be nuts not to have a prenuptial agreement - I would never get married without one - do the math you idiots - these things fail more often than not - when she leaves she leaves with what she came with - if we made things together during our marriage we can divide that - but a bitch is not entitled to things I made before our marriage - if you have nothing who cares about a prenup.
ucking:Marriage is a legal contract. Why would you not discuss the terms if that contract were to be ended. Marriage was invented to give women the right to own property, people seem to forget that it was not started as some religious thing. "til death do us part" a bunch of BS, the fact is a marriage will probably not last so why in the world put yourself in a position where you will be financially strapped because of a divorse. Women always seem to get around the pre nups anyway, they always get their way in court.
heatohio said:
Actually, marriage was invented to prevent women from owning property and to ensure that property went on to male heirs.
That said, as a woman, I would insist on a prenup. Whatever we have before the marriage, whatever we might inherit, that is ours as individuals. Only what we earn as a married couple should be shared.
If you do not completely trust your partner with everything you own and will ever own, including your children, your marriage is doomed to fail.
If you feel you need a pre-nup, you are either engaged to Anna Nicole Smith or you are not ready to get married to that person at that time.
If you feel you need a pre-nup, you are either engaged to Anna Nicole Smith or you are not ready to get married to that person at that time.
