Twins @ vs. Indians

PROSIDESPORTS · Apr 7, 2006

Indians (Bryd listed) pk-151 over the Twins
a .0035 rated selection x total bankroll wager
lines and wagers courtsey of
www.pinnaclesports.com

Indians over-priced, but a loser never cashes either.......
Believe the Twins starter Lohse(R) and the the Twins
bullpen (a bullpen that lost it's left-handed specialist,
J.C. Romero) and has yet to really find a reliable
replacement could see some trouble sometime during
the contest when needing a tough out against either
Sizemore and or Hafner (both outstanding left-handed
hitters) for the Indians. Always like taking a crafty
veteran pitcher over the 'kids'. This is a very big start
for Bryd (Indians being the team that drafted him, but
never got to start for.......)

jwblue · Apr 7, 2006

Value was in the Twins. But there is no value in a losing wager!

Good call so far.

IS

PROSIDESPORTS · Apr 7, 2006

There is never

any value in a loser..........that being said, you must
have a wagering system implemented that deals with
that situation that puts you back in control of even the
games that are over-priced and under-priced for that
matter. But always play the winning side (the side
with all the right reasons), not the so called 'value'
side, that's exactly what the bookies are trying to get
you to do, play the side they want you on....
don't think they are not..........

jwblue · Apr 7, 2006

PROSIDESPORTS said:
any value in a loser..........that being said, you must
have a wagering system implemented that deals with
that situation that puts you back in control of even the
games that are over-priced and under-priced for that
matter. But always play the winning side (the side
with all the right reasons), not the so called 'value'
side, that's exactly what the bookies are trying to get
you to do, play the side they want you on....
don't think they are not..........

Exactly. I never understood people that placed wagers based on value.

IS

Mauneau733 · Apr 7, 2006

There's a fine line I guess.

I put a small wager on the Twins and Lohse because it seemed a good value and because I thought they would win. Lohsie had an awesome spring, but obviously — painfully — it has been demonstrated once again that the way you play in March is completely meaningless.

Can't always be afraid to play a dog, but if you're playing a +200 just solely because you can double the money you lay, you're probably a fool.

PROSIDESPORTS · Apr 7, 2006

Win or lose........

you must play the side that has the majority of the
right reasons of winning, I call it 'Common Sense'
wagering......
The price of that side never dictates wether I play it
or not, just how much I play it for...........
Right reasoning dictates how much I bet it for, also.....
How many right reasons vs. right reasons for the other
side......you can always come up with reasoning to take
one side or another, it's just which one has the most valuable
right reasoning than the other........

Does anyone understand what I am trying to say?
I'm not sure I do, but whatever I've been doing all these years
it's been winning me money, so who gives a fuck! Right?

Twins @ vs. Indians

Search

PROSIDESPORTS

Banned

jwblue

New member

PROSIDESPORTS

Banned

jwblue

New member

Mauneau733

New member

PROSIDESPORTS

Banned

Forum statistics

Share this page