Resume incomplete until Tiger rallies to win major

WCBias · Apr 10, 2006

so says Tim Dahlberg of the LV Review Journal.

What an assinine assessment. Kind of like saying Hank Aaron's resume is incomplete because he never played for a world series winner. I don't really get why people feel the need to find something, anything really, to knock about his game.

Tiger might be a front-runner, but there is absolutely nothing missing from his resume, ask the other 30,000 or so other PGA players that have played on the tour throughout history that haven't achieved what he has.

dougstewart · Apr 10, 2006

WC Bias said:
so says Tim Dahlberg of the LV Review Journal.

What an assinine assessment. Kind of like saying Hank Aaron's resume is incomplete because he never played for a world series winner. I don't really get why people feel the need to find something, anything really, to knock about his game.

Tiger might be a front-runner, but there is absolutely nothing missing from his resume, ask the other 30,000 or so other PGA players that have played on the tour throughout history that haven't achieved what he has.

WC Pot,
I find it interesting that you do the same thing you accuse Tim Kettle of doing. Why knock his article? His point is that Tiger has achieved everything EXCEPT winning a major from behind; when Tiger does this, that feat will be added to his resume.

Fishhead · Apr 10, 2006

PHIL is the best player in the world.

WCBias · Apr 10, 2006

doug stewart said:
WC Pot,
I find it interesting that you do the same thing you accuse Tim Kettle of doing. Why knock his article? His point is that Tiger has achieved everything EXCEPT winning a major from behind; when Tiger does this, that feat will be added to his resume.

I knocked his article because it's pointless, senseless, and stupid. Is it THAT newsworthy to merely point out that Tiger has not come from behind to win a major that it is on the front page of the sports section as you suggest? Are you kidding me...this is the 2nd biggest story in sports news this Monday?

Dahlberg isn't just trying to point out what most golf fans already know, he's taking a shot at Tiger Woods. That there is one little tiny item missing from his expansive resume is not front page material. When Tiger does come from behind this ass-munch and clowns like you will have some other rediculous angle denigrating Tiger's game. BTW, stupid fucking pot/kettle analogy.

golfingarkansas · Apr 10, 2006

Fishhead said:
PHIL is the best player in the world.

fish, c'mon man!!! Say it ain't so!!!

He has been the best for two tourmanents and has two of the last three
Green Jackets, but the last 10 yrs he has had his ass handed to him by Tiger!!! Tiger had a bad tourmanent and was third...We were just talking
two yrs ago that the best playert to never win a Major was Phil.

Ga

earl · Apr 10, 2006

tiger is the best, but i gotta admit that i would like to see him come from behind to win one. it is a bit curious that he has yet to do so...... i remember the late great dale earnhardt was given a hard time for not ever winning a road course race or the daytona 500, and he finally did both before he died.

BigDane · Apr 10, 2006

Whoever thinks Tiger is not number #1 in the world is smoking something good and needs to send me some of that so I can get all fu**ed myself

dougstewart · Apr 10, 2006

WC Bias said:
I knocked his article because it's pointless, senseless, and stupid. Is it THAT newsworthy to merely point out that Tiger has not come from behind to win a major that it is on the front page of the sports section as you suggest? Are you kidding me...this is the 2nd biggest story in sports news this Monday?

Dahlberg isn't just trying to point out what most golf fans already know, he's taking a shot at Tiger Woods. That there is one little tiny item missing from his expansive resume is not front page material. When Tiger does come from behind this ass-munch and clowns like you will have some other rediculous angle denigrating Tiger's game. BTW, stupid fucking pot/kettle analogy.

And I knocked your post because it's pointless, senseless, and stupid...just like it's author!

The point is that when Tiger comes from behind to win a major, that fact will be added to his resume, ergo, his resume is incomplete now. The ridiculous thing is for you to expect Tiger's resume to be complete at age 30...did you expect him to quit playing? When Tiger wins a second grand slam, that too will be added to his resume. WC, you are a stupid (and obnoxious) idiot, but I will make it a point to correct you when you're wrong.

Sincerely,
your pal, Doug

WorldNumberOne · Apr 10, 2006

Fishhead said:
PHIL is the best player in the world.

wrong..

my official rankings :

tiger
retief goosen
phil
vijay
ernie
adam scott
furyk
sergio
ME

golfingarkansas · Apr 10, 2006

World Number One said:
wrong..

my official rankings :

tiger
retief goosen
phil
vijay
ernie
adam scott
furyk
sergio
ME

i think it is really accurate, Adam Scott has the best swing, but just needs
a better mind, way to nice.

nascarphenom · Apr 10, 2006

doug stewart said:
WC Pot,
I find it interesting that you do the same thing you accuse Tim Kettle of doing. Why knock his article? His point is that Tiger has achieved everything EXCEPT winning a major from behind; when Tiger does this, that feat will be added to his resume.

I think that may be the most assinign arguement ever. Forget that Tiger has won 10 majors before turning 30 (where every other golfer STARTS to hit their peak), but because he did it in such dominating fashion, he cant have the "come from behind win" added to his resume

I hope Tiger NEVER wins from behind. That would be a greater feat! The man is plain sick, and anyone who bashes him should be beaten with a hammer.

CHOPTALK · Apr 10, 2006

WC Bias said:
so says Tim Dahlberg of the LV Review Journal.

What an assinine assessment. Kind of like saying Hank Aaron's resume is incomplete because he never played for a world series winner. I don't really get why people feel the need to find something, anything really, to knock about his game.

Tiger might be a front-runner, but there is absolutely nothing missing from his resume, ask the other 30,000 or so other PGA players that have played on the tour throughout history that haven't achieved what he has.

Hank Aaron did play for a world series winner. 1957

dougstewart · Apr 10, 2006

Special delivery for WC Bias...horse won the 2nd race at Tampa...

3 Rediculousforever

...and it's still not in the dictionary. Sorta like being consigned to misspelling hell.

WCBias · Apr 10, 2006

doug stewart said:
And I knocked your post because it's pointless, senseless, and stupid...just like it's author!

The point is that when Tiger comes from behind to win a major, that fact will be added to his resume, ergo, his resume is incomplete now. The ridiculous thing is for you to expect Tiger's resume to be complete at age 30...did you expect him to quit playing? When Tiger wins a second grand slam, that too will be added to his resume. WC, you are a stupid (and obnoxious) idiot, but I will make it a point to correct you when you're wrong.

Sincerely,
your pal, Doug

there is no point bitch...all your excess bagage above has nothing to do with the original post. No one but you said anything about Tiger being done at 30, winning a second grand slam, or you ever being correct. If I wanted more of your editorials...never mind, your editorials are always misguided.

it's not the second biggest story of the Master's, much less the 2nd biggest story of the entire sports world. Only haters would make an argument that Tiger's resume is incomplete of anything...then try to make a story of it. Fred Couples missing two five foot puts is a better story than Tiger not coming from behind yesterday...

nascarphenom · Apr 10, 2006

WC Bias said:
Only haters would make an argument that Tiger's resume is incomplete of anything...then try to make a story of it. Fred Couples missing two five foot puts is a better story than Tiger not coming from behind yesterday...

:thumbsup2: :thumbsup2: :thumbsup2:

PREACH ON BROTHA! IM BEHIND YOU 100%

oldmanTED · Apr 10, 2006

Tiger has just turned 30 I believe and has already won how many majors? It doesn't matter how, it's how many. Only a matter of time before he comes from behind to win one. Sometimes the media just cranks out statements with little to no meaning. Remember, Phil can't win a major. It was only a matter of time.

BC-Eagles · Apr 10, 2006

Tiger last 5 Majors: Tied 3rd, Tied 4th, Won, 2nd, Won. Anyone come close to that?

WCBias · Apr 10, 2006

BC-Eagles said:
Tiger last 5 Majors: Tied 3rd, Tied 4th, Won, 2nd, Won. Anyone come close to that?

But he's never come from behind! 2nd biggest sports story of the day here in Las Vegas

BC-Eagles · Apr 10, 2006

he doesn't need to when he's killing the field. you don't want to come from behind.

WCBias · Apr 10, 2006

BC-Eagles said:
he doesn't need to when he's killing the field. you don't want to come from behind.

Exactly. Its completely irrelevant, as is anyone that believes it or espouses it.

Resume incomplete until Tiger rallies to win major

New member

New member

Active member

New member

New member

Member

Drink Away

New member

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper

New member

Johnboy

Member

New member

New member

Johnboy

Professional At All Times

New member

New member

New member

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page