Sorry about the dodger total but at least both games are looking good. The dodger play was on Seo but I figured the safer play was the under and counting on what I thought was a week la offense. I am mad I didnt play 1 unit on LA in case they got the total by themself. Sad thing is, there is no such thing as a week offense this year as even the worst teams are hitting and putting up runs. The MLB batting average is over 270 right now up from the usual 250-260 range. I havent put a finger on why yet. Doesnt seem like it is the umps which was the first place I looked. My guess is MLB wants offense so they can say steriods wasnt the only way numbers went up. This time it might really be a juiced ball. Time will tell. In the meantime I will be backing off the totals a bit. The games are starting to fall a little more into place. If we can get a hold of the totals, we can start to roll
tn
tn
Tomorrow's Newspaper said:
Here is my theory. It may sound ridiculous, but its got just as much chance of being true is the juiced ball.
http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=366212&highlight=steriods
Sekrah said:
I do from time to time, but usually prefer a tandum bet. that being a bet where either I feel if one thing happens, the other should also, or my more popular version where I make a bet that cover the first bet but also has a chance to win.
Now that you are confused, let me explain. Say I love Peavy to pitch a gem for San Diego and I bet san diego -150 for 3 units. I might feel the only way I lose that game is if someone pitches a better gem. I might bet 2 units on the under to protect the first bet, and hope Peavy wins 3-0 so I can win both bets. I figure if the game went over, it is because San diego scored a bunch. I guess betting the team total of the team SD is playing under would do the same thing, but if San Diego wins 8-5 I cant win with that team total.
Anyway, I am tired and rambling but hopefully you get the gist of what I am saying. I'm not even sure I know what I said, but I do know what I meant..... I think
