I better list everything...
YTD Posted RX Record:
sides: 16-21 (-13.40 units)
totals: 6-3 (+2.68 units)
R/L's: 20-34 (+10.74 units)
overall: 42-58 (+0.02 units)
road team, system record: 48-12 (+57.80 units).
so you can see, my posted record this season has been pretty much of a wash... During this time i have also come upon a system, that plays either the runline or alternate runline, with the road team .. The results have been outstanding, to start the season: 48-12 (+57.80 units)... Ill be glad to discuss this record and any set of series this season.. But i dont feel like breaking it down again. While this looks good on the surface, i just dont see how it can hold out.. It appears, that you need to go 12-3 to make the good money. And probably will break about even at 11-4, of course this depends on when you get the wins in a series, as games 2 and 3 will pay more... I have been constantly thinking of a way to better the money management aspect of this.. In this thread, ill list the system plays for the first set of series this week, just how i drew the thing up originally. Then ill also list my modified version of this, and see which one does better. I have a couple more weeks, until april ends and i need all the info that i can get, as i plan on having my final plan for the season in place by then...
Original System: 48-12 (+57.80 units)
plays for monday: april 17th.... week 3/ series set 1
stl -1.5 (+1.00) 1 unit
fla -1.5 (+2.70) 1 unit
atl -1.5 (+3.01) 1 unit
mil -1.5 (+1.70) 1 unit
sd -1.5 (+1.70) 1 unit
cubs -1.5 (+1.55) 1 unit
sf -1.5 (NL posted) will update later..
KC -1.5 (+4.25) 1 unit.
now im going to compare this to an altered version.
altered version.: 0-0 (+0.00 units)
Stl -1.5 (+1.00) 1 unit.
Cubs -1.5 (+1.55) 1 unit.
SF (NL, as of now) 1 unit
these are the only 3 plays in the altered version. as i have placed a weeding out filter into the equation.. there will only be a total of 7 series played, with the altered version..
skip over all this, if not interested but i need to find out, which way is going to be better...
YTD Posted RX Record:
sides: 16-21 (-13.40 units)
totals: 6-3 (+2.68 units)
R/L's: 20-34 (+10.74 units)
overall: 42-58 (+0.02 units)
road team, system record: 48-12 (+57.80 units).
so you can see, my posted record this season has been pretty much of a wash... During this time i have also come upon a system, that plays either the runline or alternate runline, with the road team .. The results have been outstanding, to start the season: 48-12 (+57.80 units)... Ill be glad to discuss this record and any set of series this season.. But i dont feel like breaking it down again. While this looks good on the surface, i just dont see how it can hold out.. It appears, that you need to go 12-3 to make the good money. And probably will break about even at 11-4, of course this depends on when you get the wins in a series, as games 2 and 3 will pay more... I have been constantly thinking of a way to better the money management aspect of this.. In this thread, ill list the system plays for the first set of series this week, just how i drew the thing up originally. Then ill also list my modified version of this, and see which one does better. I have a couple more weeks, until april ends and i need all the info that i can get, as i plan on having my final plan for the season in place by then...
Original System: 48-12 (+57.80 units)
plays for monday: april 17th.... week 3/ series set 1
stl -1.5 (+1.00) 1 unit
fla -1.5 (+2.70) 1 unit
atl -1.5 (+3.01) 1 unit
mil -1.5 (+1.70) 1 unit
sd -1.5 (+1.70) 1 unit
cubs -1.5 (+1.55) 1 unit
sf -1.5 (NL posted) will update later..
KC -1.5 (+4.25) 1 unit.
now im going to compare this to an altered version.
altered version.: 0-0 (+0.00 units)
Stl -1.5 (+1.00) 1 unit.
Cubs -1.5 (+1.55) 1 unit.
SF (NL, as of now) 1 unit
these are the only 3 plays in the altered version. as i have placed a weeding out filter into the equation.. there will only be a total of 7 series played, with the altered version..
skip over all this, if not interested but i need to find out, which way is going to be better...
