Anyone Like The Colorado Under Tonight?

TTinCO? What do you think bro? I need some action with Hockey off until Wednesday! LOOKS AWESOME TO ME!! FEEDBACK?

O/U is 11 with Fogg and Tomko both coming off excellent outings.

I'd lean towards the over for a couple reasons.

-I'm not sold on Fogg yet
-It's finally starting to warm up & dry out (Dew point in the teens)
-Colorado needs to break out of this scoring rut. I think LA is good for 6-7 runs. Can the Rocks score 4-5?

It's going to really warm up tomorrow & Wed. Thinking over on both games.

Colorado -1.5 +186 for me

Rockies Straight up for me Fogg Great last outing !

hmmm decisions decisions. I just noticed Chan Hoe is pitching. He was GAWD AWFUL for the strangers. Maybe i should take the RL against him?

need a late play who ya like??

if you are just itching for a play just for the sake of it i suggest that you dont pick a game at all.. if u dont have a good read on a game or n e thing y dont u save ur money until u really see something... ?

noted thanks

Insiders said:

Rockies Straight up for me Fogg Great last outing !

Click to expand...

Saw youre RL post on Arizona - Playing that

Screw it-I'm taking a medium shot at the over.

Tomko, who has won his last three decisions, has not allowed a run over his last 16 innings. He has also yielded five hits or less in each of his last four starts. Brett Tomko threw six scoreless innings Wednesday against the Astros; Tomko walked three and allowed just one hit while striking out three and lowering his ERA to 2.93

Both games pitched by fogg this year at home have gone under.

Im on the under bro

NEVERMIND


Under is 8-1-1 in COL last 10 night games.
<LI class=more>Under is 13-3-1 in COL last 17 overall.<LI class=more> Under is 13-3-1 in COL last 17 on Grass<LI class=more><LI class=more><LI class=more><LI class=more>Took the over for 2 units!!!!!!! GL TTinCO!!!

I also played these team totals

LA over 5.5 -107
Col over 5 -115

At worst a split right??

Bourn said:

I also played these team totals

LA over 5.5 -107
Col over 5 -115

At worst a split right??

Click to expand...

You would certainly have to think that at least one of those is good.

Bourn said:

NEVERMIND


Under is 8-1-1 in COL last 10 night games.

<LI class=more>Under is 13-3-1 in COL last 17 overall.<LI class=more>Under is 13-3-1 in COL last 17 on Grass<LI class=more><LI class=more><LI class=more><LI class=more>Took the over for 2 units!!!!!!! GL TTinCO!!!

Click to expand...

Well....I'm trying to understand: You liked the under. You then found stats that trended toward under and you decided to be contrarian and play the over? Why would you like to play the over in this case? Help me understand your reasoning. tulsa

The way that stat reads is misleading. It should be read O/U i am thinking Usually (if not all the time) the over is the first number and the under the second. Its straight off covers. I was thinking the same thing when i first looked at it, but if you look at the games it looks like this"

<TABLE class=data cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2><TBODY><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/14/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 7 - COL 8 </TD><TD class=datacell>Houlton, D</TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, B</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 109</TD><TD class=datacell>O 8</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/13/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 4 - COL 6 </TD><TD class=datacell>Jackson, E</TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, S</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 105</TD><TD class=datacell>O 8.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/12/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 7 - COL 0 </TD><TD class=datacell>Weaver, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Francis, J</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 151</TD><TD class=datacell>U 8</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/4/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 7 - LA 6 x </TD><TD class=datacell>Day, Z</TD><TD class=datacell>Jackson, E</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 114</TD><TD class=datacell>O 12</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/3/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 11 - LA 1 </TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, B</TD><TD class=datacell>Houlton, D</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 114</TD><TD class=datacell>O 11</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>9/2/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 11 - LA 3 </TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, S</TD><TD class=datacell>Weaver, J</TD><TD class=datacell>COL -113</TD><TD class=datacell>O 11</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>8/25/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 4 - COL 5 </TD><TD class=datacell>Penny, B</TD><TD class=datacell>Cook, A</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 172</TD><TD class=datacell>O 7.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>8/24/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 1 - COL 2 </TD><TD class=datacell>Houlton, D</TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, B</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 142</TD><TD class=datacell>U 8</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>8/23/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 8 - COL 3 </TD><TD class=datacell>Weaver, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Wright, J</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 162</TD><TD class=datacell>O 7.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>7/7/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 8 - LA 5 </TD><TD class=datacell>Kennedy, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Lowe, D</TD><TD class=datacell>COL -110</TD><TD class=datacell>O 11.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>7/6/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 5 - LA 9 </TD><TD class=datacell>Chacon, S</TD><TD class=datacell>Penny, B</TD><TD class=datacell>LA -110</TD><TD class=datacell>O 11.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>7/5/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 6 - LA 1 </TD><TD class=datacell>Francis, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Perez, O</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 118</TD><TD class=datacell>U 11.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>7/4/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 3 - LA 4 x </TD><TD class=datacell>Kim, B</TD><TD class=datacell>Weaver, J</TD><TD class=datacell>LA -103</TD><TD class=datacell>U 12</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>5/1/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 2 - COL 1 </TD><TD class=datacell>Lowe, D</TD><TD class=datacell>Chacon, S</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 162</TD><TD class=datacell>U 7.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>4/30/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 6 - COL 2 </TD><TD class=datacell>Penny, B</TD><TD class=datacell>Kennedy, J</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 151</TD><TD class=datacell>P 8</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>4/29/05</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 6 - COL 3 </TD><TD class=datacell>Perez, O</TD><TD class=datacell>Jennings, J</TD><TD class=datacell>LA 162</TD><TD class=datacell>O 7.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>4/24/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 6 - LA 8 </TD><TD class=datacell>Francis, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Penny, B</TD><TD class=datacell>LA -107</TD><TD class=datacell>O 12</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>4/23/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 8 - LA 6 </TD><TD class=datacell>Chacon, S</TD><TD class=datacell>Perez, O</TD><TD class=datacell>COL -130</TD><TD class=datacell>O 11.5</TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>4/22/05</TD><TD class=datacell>COL 9 - LA 1 </TD><TD class=datacell>Jennings, J</TD><TD class=datacell>Weaver, J</TD><TD class=datacell>COL -127</TD><TD class=datacell>U 13</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


O/U is 12-6-1 by my math......i think its misleading personally

Fogg is damn lucky to get out of the 1st unscathed.

(shit...)

Well, OK...but I'm still confused. I took the under. Good luck. tulsa