action EVERYWHERE. I can get sloppy and miss one here or there. I know alot of people don't agree but I don't want to be checking all day long to see if their has been a pitching change and my wager has been cancelled, some may disagree but I feel in the long run the action side can help you as much as hurt you. Heck I have Seattle -134 @ on this bet.Doug said:
There is nothing to be gained by betting a game with action instead of listed. The only reason they have that option is for junkies. If you are a pro, or at least someone that attempts to win at this game, listed is the only way to go. The wager is still cancelled with action if there is a pitching change. It's just that you automatically get a new wager with the same risk amount at the new price when the betting re-opens. So you didn't have -134 on this game tonight. Check your graded wagers, and you'll see that you had the Mariners at the opening price of the new line. Pitching changes are rare, but they have a huge effect on whether or not you will want to bet a game. Why tell the book beforehand that you still want to bet a game in the case of a pitching change, if there is no way to know at that point if you really would like to bet it or not? Heck, you may even want to bet the other side if there is a pitching change.ice man said:
