Insiders said:As i have mentioned many times sinse the First week of this baseball season. "I would not bet Any baseball total under, even with counterfeit money!"
Excellent post.2tite said:I'm getting tired of posters in sports forums complaining their 'sharp' under totals aren't winning this season. Whats more important, being considered a 'sharp', or winning more wagers than losing? If this year is nothing but overs, BET THE OVERS. Waiting for books to adjust just for the sake of betting under is simply retarted. "oh, I don't bet overs, only squares bet favorites and overs". To me, a sharp isn't defined by his betting trends but wether he ends the season making $$$ or losing it.
acw said:Excellent post.
You do not want to know how many bookies/agents I have seen taken to the cleaners, because they thought that their clients were squares, since they often bet favourites and overs.
2tite said:I'm getting tired of posters in sports forums complaining their 'sharp' under totals aren't winning this season. Whats more important, being considered a 'sharp', or winning more wagers than losing? If this year is nothing but overs, BET THE OVERS. Waiting for books to adjust just for the sake of betting under is simply retarted. "oh, I don't bet overs, only squares bet favorites and overs". To me, a sharp isn't defined by his betting trends but wether he ends the season making $$$ or losing it.
this is a very interesting stat. Someone could have made a killing off of this.ktvvegas said:54% of games have gone over this year. (696-592) (pushes removed)
Marlins have been golden for overs (70% after today) and Rockies continue to be solid unders (36%)
Will be interesting to see how this shakes out in the next 2-3 months for posted totals.