Starting pitchers have always been the jumping off point for baseball handicapping--and the lines reflect that more than anything--but should that be the case anymore?
The last third (or more!) of most games belong to the bullpen--do most handicappers factor that into their thinking enough?
There are certain bullpens we know suck--Atlanta's for example. But how much do we really know about other bullpens?
Maybe we should all become bullpen experts.
The last third (or more!) of most games belong to the bullpen--do most handicappers factor that into their thinking enough?
There are certain bullpens we know suck--Atlanta's for example. But how much do we really know about other bullpens?
Maybe we should all become bullpen experts.