Here is what I dont understand and sorry if this has been brought up in the other threads but ... if they took this Artie guys winnings because he was chasing steam ... why do they not REFUND the money he bet when he lost chasing steam? Its not like he became a sharp or syndicate player all of the sudden ... based on their syndicate excuse you have to consider him a syndicate from the start no and base all his bets on him being part of a syndicate??
Then clearly they should go back and refund all his plays ... not just the winning ones?
This just doesnt make sense to me... but thanks for allowing me to vent...
O.
Then clearly they should go back and refund all his plays ... not just the winning ones?
This just doesnt make sense to me... but thanks for allowing me to vent...
O.
