Capping the pen vs Capping the Starting pitcher

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
Anyone who says that this season is just like any other season is not studying there stats.

There are absolutly more blown leads this season than ever before. So instead of whinning about it all the time, we have to decide on how to adjust to these bullpens.

I use to use an 80/20 ratio, starter vs bullpen, but I am 100% certain that im going to have to adjust down to no less than 65/35, but thats only half the problem solved.

Here is my great dilema. I was wondering if anyone has in imput to maybe help my process along.

The problem is, its much more difficult to cap a bullpen than the starting pitcher.

Its real easy to cap a teams starter. He normally gets 4 to 5 days rest, the manager on the opposing team makes out his starting lineup based on the righty or lefty starter.

The hard part is capping the bullpen. Although you can usally get a pretty good idea who is going to pitch the 9th inning, you really dont know for a 100% fact who the manager is going to use in the dreaded 6th,7th and 8th inning for a 100% fact.

I know you can get an idea by checking whos been used alot, and a managers normal bullpen rotation, but there is no way to know for sure.

I am not going to put another dime of my money on another baseball bet until I can get some kind of system down with positive expectation when it comes to these pens It needs to be something systematic, so you can quickly cap the games and hit the overnight lines. Im sure there is something out there that can help out. Thats why I made this thread. You never know who may come in here with a brillant idea that I have never thought of yet.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
I dont notice any more blown leads this year. What do the blown save numbers look like this year compared to years past?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
Poker King Jim said:
I dont notice any more blown leads this year. What do the blown save numbers look like this year compared to years past?

Its not the blown saves in the 9th. Its the blown leads in the 7th and 8th. Middle relief is whats been different.

I can cap the starter and the closer. Its the pitcher in between thats the problem. I mentioned that in the thread.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 13, 2005
Messages
1,371
Tokens
why not just play bets on the first five innings. it seems the starting pitchers are lucky to give six innings. good luck
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
the tout said:
why not just play bets on the first five innings. it seems the starting pitchers are lucky to give six innings. good luck

I knew someone was going to bring that up.

I dont like the idea of a 5 inning bet one bit. Not enough sample to make a good bet. You need to have at least 2.5 rotations thru a batting order to get a true and legit bet IMO.

This is why I have been begging the sportsbooks to offer a 7inning line. Half my bankroll goes in the first book that offers this.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
4,066
Tokens
I think one of the reasons the relief pitching is doing so erratically this year is that the starting pitchers aren't going very deep into the game. The relief pitchers are coming in the 5th and 6th inning many times.
Take the Yankees, most of the starting pitchers are lucky to make it through the 6th inning. They rarely let Wright pitch into the 6th, Johnson gets shelled half the time and has only lasted past 5 innings in 5 of his 10 starts.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
Captain Carl said:
I think one of the reasons the relief pitching is doing so erratically this year is that the starting pitchers aren't going very deep into the game. The relief pitchers are coming in the 5th and 6th inning many times.
Take the Yankees, most of the starting pitchers are lucky to make it through the 6th inning. They rarely let Wright pitch into the 6th, Johnson gets shelled half the time and has only lasted past 5 innings in 5 of his 10 starts.

You are 100% correct, and its only going to get worse as the season goes on. I made a thread at the beginning of the season on why I think this is happening and everyone laughed. But the proof is starting to pile up.

This thread
http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=366212&highlight=steriods

and this post.

add another pitcher to the list of offenders.

When are people going to learn that its the pitchers that use this stuff more than the hitters.

Do you want to know why pitcher use steriods and HGH more than hitters?

Because they help pitchers more than hitters.

Recovery time is the biggest benifit of steriods. Recovery time is much more important for a pitcher than a hitter.

A first baseman can go out there and play 162 with no problem, but a relief pitcher that throws 70 to 80 games a year needs the recovery time more than any other player on the field.

I started a thread about this at the beginning of the season and everyone laughed at me.

Im being proved right more and more everyday.

This is why the bullpens have been so bad this season. Its only going to get worse as the season goes on.

BTW, its the middle relievers that cant afford the HGH, these are the ones thats been getting pounded this season. Thats why a lead in the 7th and 8th inning dont mean much anymore.

The ARODs and SOSA of the world can afford this stuff. The middle reliever making 119K per season cant.


The average cost of MLB grade HGH cost about $300 per day!!!!!! Thats almost 10 grand per month and 100K per year. The middle reliever cant afford that, thus they are getting bombed.
<!-- / message -->
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
627
Tokens
But yet baseball hasn't changed a bit in a year.
Why is it people always blame someone/something else for their failures?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
171
Tokens
Chop, just some thoughts. I think over the last several years this dilemma has existed in baseball. Pitching has been diluted to the point where 3,4 and 5 starters on some teams would not have even made the majors 10 years ago, hence the bullpen plays an increasing role over that time in determining the winner.

I think using a 65/35 split is ok as a filter, but for the games that I want to take a closer look at (can't do all games would take too much time), I use the avg inn per start of the pitcher, then slide it up or down, depending on recent form and situations, then see how many innings I have left and factor in the bullpen accordingly.

With good pitchers this works best, but if I come down to only 5 innings, it can be an educated guess on who the first pitcher is off the bench. But if all still shows a better probability vs the line and there is value, the bet is placed. Also as you, each game is bet for different units depending on the value (if that theory was good enough for the computer group and the kosher kids, then who am I to argue). gl
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
11,731
Tokens
Poker King Jim said:
I dont notice any more blown leads this year. What do the blown save numbers look like this year compared to years past?
I agree somewhat. Though I have a seen an article on this and their are more blown leads than last year but with that being said it is no excuse. Chop is right he is empahasizing way too much on starting pitcher if he feel this way. Time to adjust.

For a guy like Poker King Jim, it looks like you dont put as much stock in starting pitching as most. I asked a similar question earlier in the year and was shocked and somewhat ridiculed for only making s.pitching 40% of my capping number. That is the way I have always did it.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
Iceman said:
I agree somewhat. Though I have a seen an article on this and their are more blown leads than last year but with that being said it is no excuse. Chop is right he is empahasizing way too much on starting pitcher if he feel this way. Time to adjust.

For a guy like Poker King Jim, it looks like you dont put as much stock in starting pitching as most. I asked a similar question earlier in the year and was shocked and somewhat ridiculed for only making s.pitching 40% of my capping number. That is the way I have always did it.

Dont get me wrong ICEMAN.

The overall % of pitching as far as importance has not changed one bit.

Its still 70% pitching and 30% everything else.

My old 80/20 and my new 65/35ish has only to do with the pitching itself.

Overall value on power-ratings is still

70% PITCHING(65 STARTER and 35 PEN) Old numbers were (80 STARTER and 20 PEN)

20% OVERTEAM LINEUP (DEFFENSE AND HITTING)
5% HOMEFIELD
5% LAST 15 games HOT OR COLD
 

New member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,691
Tokens
I think its clear the difference is the absense of pick me up drugs. Next year it may stabilize. I personally just look at available relief pitching and their last 3 starts and just devalue season results.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,954
Tokens
Chop what you might need to do is look at the relievers' stats over the past few years and compare it to this year. That can help you judge the riod testing effects for each person. I don't know if you can get average pitch speed anywhere, but other things like era might help.
 

Last night I drank enough to kill a small Asian fa
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
6,839
Tokens
plato said:
Chop, just some thoughts. I think over the last several years this dilemma has existed in baseball. Pitching has been diluted to the point where 3,4 and 5 starters on some teams would not have even made the majors 10 years ago, hence the bullpen plays an increasing role over that time in determining the winner.

I think using a 65/35 split is ok as a filter, but for the games that I want to take a closer look at (can't do all games would take too much time), I use the avg inn per start of the pitcher, then slide it up or down, depending on recent form and situations, then see how many innings I have left and factor in the bullpen accordingly.

With good pitchers this works best, but if I come down to only 5 innings, it can be an educated guess on who the first pitcher is off the bench. But if all still shows a better probability vs the line and there is value, the bet is placed. Also as you, each game is bet for different units depending on the value (if that theory was good enough for the computer group and the kosher kids, then who am I to argue). gl


Very sharp post.

Chop, why use 80/20? I don't cap baseball, but doesn't that mean that you assume that the average pitcher is pitching 7.1 Inning per start? Where did you get 80% from?
 

Back from the Ban
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
3,606
Tokens
Iceman said:
I agree somewhat. Though I have a seen an article on this and their are more blown leads than last year but with that being said it is no excuse. Chop is right he is empahasizing way too much on starting pitcher if he feel this way. Time to adjust.

For a guy like Poker King Jim, it looks like you dont put as much stock in starting pitching as most. I asked a similar question earlier in the year and was shocked and somewhat ridiculed for only making s.pitching 40% of my capping number. That is the way I have always did it.

Ice, assuming both teams are on a 1 game winning streak, playing at a neutral site, sp is an avg of 33% of my number.

Chop,
Unfortunately, relief pitching hasn't been worse. You're biased as the braves have been very poor, and that is the team you watch the most. Relief pitching is within the statistical norm, and it hasn't changed.

I rate offenses 3-6-9, bullpens 1-2-3, and starters 2-4-6. (higher # the better). An 80/20 split is a bit extreme.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
HinesWard86 said:
Very sharp post.

Chop, why use 80/20? I don't cap baseball, but doesn't that mean that you assume that the average pitcher is pitching 7.1 Inning per start? Where did you get 80% from?

All I can tell you is that it worked for years.

Cant argue with success.

I agree that in todays times, 80/20 is too much.

Im going to use 65/35.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,310
Tokens
Budworth22 said:
Chop,
Unfortunately, relief pitching hasn't been worse. You're biased as the braves have been very poor, and that is the team you watch the most. Relief pitching is within the statistical norm, and it hasn't changed.

Bud its real late, but I have the stats to blow your comment totally out of the water.

I will post the stats right here tommorow.

The blown saves are not quite at historic highs, although its close. Its the middle relief that has been getting destroyed.

ERA is not the best factor to use.

HOLDS is a very key catagory.

Also the most simple stat of all. Blown leads after the 6th inning are way up this year. It was starting to trend that way in the 2nd half of last season, but its taken a new level this year.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
Very observant iceman - I think starting pitching is way overrated when capping games. I love betting better offense/bullpen with a worse starter against a weaker team with a good starter such as Boston/Atlanta on Friday.
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
11,731
Tokens
the point is handicapping a temas hitting is WAY MORE accurate and consistent than some average inconsistent pitcher. That is why 65% is way too hig. In his eyes in means everything.

40% pitching
30 team offense
30 overall team (how good they are). Which seems to be lacking big time from chop's equation.

than add in home field
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,695
Messages
13,453,529
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com