So, you have two men on 2nd and two men on 3rd...

Tulsa

Rx Post Doc

Joined

Feb 8, 2005

Messages

12,805

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #1

You have two men on 2nd and two men on 3rd and ONE out. How many of these four will score? Oh yeah...in this scenario you get something like 3.5 more outs statistically to end the inning.

How about NONE if you have the OVER in the O's/Mets game.

Three situations put a total of two men on third and two men on 2nd with 1 out and NONE score. I hope this doesn't continue. tulsa

 

2PLAYSMAX

I think I want my money back!

Joined

Mar 29, 2005

Messages

41,267

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #2

theyll hit cause im tailing sworty

wheneva i do on a total %90 it hits

 

Tulsa

Rx Post Doc

Joined

Feb 8, 2005

Messages

12,805

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #3

Yeah? Not looking so hot. I hope you're right cuz I need this one in a big way to help out with my World Cup fiasco today. tulsa

 

2PLAYSMAX

I think I want my money back!

Joined

Mar 29, 2005

Messages

41,267

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #4

tuls


this maybe that %10

 

Journeyman

Banned

Joined

Sep 20, 2004

Messages

80,046

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #5

and the Cards give up a 3 spot with 2 outs!

of course....this game has few hits and many runs, because I had under, the Sox game today had runners galore and nobody could get a hit even with one out ...

 

2PLAYSMAX

I think I want my money back!

Joined

Mar 29, 2005

Messages

41,267

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #6

kinda bloody saturday

and im not drunk yet, only buzzed

 

Puccini

New member

Joined

Feb 7, 2006

Messages

557

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #7

After the first inning, when 3 runs were scored, I was kind of chalking up the over as a win. I knew that was stupid, but I couldn't help it.

Don't you hate when that happens?

 

TKE683

New member

Joined

Jan 8, 2006

Messages

2,800

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #8

If you had the over in the Mets game, you really need to read Pops running post.

 

Puccini

New member

Joined

Feb 7, 2006

Messages

557

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #9

TKE683 said:

If you had the over in the Mets game, you really need to read Pops running post.

Click to expand...

I try, but I can't make much sense out of it.

 

Tulsa

Rx Post Doc

Joined

Feb 8, 2005

Messages

12,805

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #10

TKE683 said:

If you had the over in the Mets game, you really need to read Pops running post.

Click to expand...

I do read pops69's posts and the thread. I don't always follow the plays... Sometimes that is a good thing. Sometimes not. This time was a NOT. BUT, I still look back at runners left in scoring position and the number of hits and think..."man. damn. shit...." That is what I think.

tulsa

 

TKE683

New member

Joined

Jan 8, 2006

Messages

2,800

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #11

It was a low total, and one or two more clutch hits and you probably would have gotten the over, but there are three umps they have that generally if you always play whichever direction you have a good shot, at least even if i don't play it, i lay off if i'm thinking the other way. Just making sure you had that extra piece of info for the future.
G/L

 

TKE683

New member

Joined

Jan 8, 2006

Messages

2,800

Tokens

• Jun 17, 2006

• #12

BTW...i feel your pain, i had detroit under 11.5, 4-1 after 7, 9-1 going bottom 9, 9-3 final...OUCH!! 7 runs in the last two innings, 4 in the ninth, brutal.