? for a moderator

whormoan

Snitch hater

Joined

Sep 20, 2001

Messages

9,560

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #1

If a sportsbook (to remain nameless for a minute) is so stupid as to post a game 5 prop on OV/UN points for Jerry Stackhouse without saying (player must play for action) as they typically do with such props, are they justified in cancelling and refunding the bet?

 

Dubpoet

W-R-X Champion

Joined

Dec 21, 2004

Messages

17,101

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #2

I think any Mod will tell you to max it out and go for it and the RX will back you here.

 

SportSavant

New member

Joined

Sep 21, 2003

Messages

42,910

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #3

whormoan said:

If a sportsbook (to remain nameless for a minute) is so stupid as to post a game 5 prop on OV/UN points for Jerry Stackhouse without saying (player must play for action) as they typically do with such props, are they justified in cancelling and refunding the bet?

Click to expand...

bad line rule will apply & bet could be cancelled

 

whormoan

Snitch hater

Joined

Sep 20, 2001

Messages

9,560

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #4

Intertops was the book, and they did refund the bet. Is this worth fighting?

 

SportSavant

New member

Joined

Sep 21, 2003

Messages

42,910

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #5

whormoan said:

Intertops was the book, and they did refund the bet. Is this worth fighting?

Click to expand...

no, it is a bad line, & they probably have "player must start" in their rules somewhere.

 

TTinCO

.

Joined

Sep 21, 2004

Messages

28,775

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #6

Personally, I'd say probably not (worth fighting).

 

tatehill2000

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling

Joined

Sep 20, 2004

Messages

12,632

Tokens

• Jun 18, 2006

• #7

there have been ALOT of legit complaints lately,,, that one is not one of em,,, lol

tater