Bankrolls are for the big fish. I don't see how betting 1-2% would ever get you anywhere. I have mde depoits as small as $100. For the normal everyday players I think this is how most of us do it. I will bet all my bankroll sometimes. Why not I play for fun and it's no problem to reload. So all thi bakroll talk I think does not apply to 80% of the people in here. Unless your a pro what difference does it make. Hell Ive went on runs with $50 before.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But i have been around for many many years with that ratio.
Sure you must pick winners when you get it up out of the mud. But very few people can actaully pick 50% winners. So as the ole farmers say "you must make hay while the sun shines"
I do know that bookmakers laugh when they see someone on the Grind of 1%. They most usually say i wish we had More of the kinds.
Sure you must pick winners when you get it up out of the mud. But very few people can actaully pick 50% winners. So as the ole farmers say "you must make hay while the sun shines"
I do know that bookmakers laugh when they see someone on the Grind of 1%. They most usually say i wish we had More of the kinds.
TheRightSide said:
1-2%, well it's about the longterm, most serious bettors can't handle much volatility and don't want to risk overbetting. I'd imagine anyone thinking about making money in sportsbetting would pay attention to bankroll management. It also appears that the regulars (the more serious bettors) are the ones posting in this thread.
I couldn't imagine someone betting <1% though. I just see it as a huge waste of ev, but then again I'm pretty tolerant of volatility.
:money8:
