Does it bother anyone?

Search

To be the best, you have to beat the best
Joined
Oct 20, 2000
Messages
2,608
Tokens
I wrote this little blurb in my blog in February, but it applies today:

"My faith in the integrity of sporting events continues to get shaken.

NCAA basketball officiating is a joke, favoring the home team nearly all the time. I hate it getting justified as “that’s home court advantage”. How tough is it to call a game down the middle and not get influenced by where the game is at? I continue to see home teams get ridiculous number of free throw attempts vs. visitors. Some of that can be explained off by aggressiveness, but I’m sorry, not all of it.

MLB umpiring was pretty terrible in the playoffs as well. They gift wrapped at least one game to the White Sox with the AJ “dropped” third strike play.

The NFL has been getting worse throughout the years, but the Indy-Pitt game, where the Polamalu INT was overturned was one of the first times I’ve seen what looked like an absolute agenda. Then the debacle of a Super Bowl happened, with the Jerome Bettis agenda.

The NBA has always been suspected of having agendas. The following example is very loosely defined as a sporting event. The slam dunk contest was an absolute farce. It was crystal clear to me that they wanted Nate Washington (another Spud Webb) to win it, to help keep the contest alive. While I’ll agree Iguodala wasn’t very imaginative with his remaining dunks (after the ridiculous alley oop off of the back of the backboard), it was absurd for Washington to win. What is the criteria for the dunk contest, judge the dunk on level of difficulty? Do you incorporate a players height into it? I personally don’t think you should, otherwise a short person should win every time. Lastly, something needs to be done with a system in which a player requires 7 tries before they make it once and 14 tries before they succeed again. How can that not penalize a player?? Without a penalty, I would try to dunk with the ball hanging from my teeth over and over again until I finally made it.

The 3-point contest was also a joke. In the first round eventual champion Dirk Nowitski released his last money ball clearly after the buzzer. This allowed him to make the finals and denied two other competitors the chance. I always wondered why they had officials there during this contest, and after the ref missed this one, I still wonder the same thing. It’s not like he had anything to look at other than his feet when he released and whether or not he beat the clock. There were no potential fouls, no 3-seconds, no traveling, etc…just a joke.

And no, I didn’t have money on any of the NBA events.

I find myself being less and less interested in sports as these things happen."


Now the last 3 major sporting events (I'm not counting hockey because I gave up on that sport a few years ago) have been largely decided by the officials and not the players themselves.

Baseball: The White Sox ALCS was largely changed on the AJ dropped 3rd strike play, and something else that escapes me at the moment.

Football: Superbowl was a travesty, as was the Polamalu/Manning INT.

NBA finals: We just saw the refs do everything they could to give Miami Game 5, and it can be argued Game 3 as well.

This is all getting to be too much to take. I find myself less interested every day. I don't ever remember it being like this.

Comments?
 

EJP

Beat The Odds
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
484
Tokens
Become a ref/umpire yourself and do better.....otherwise???....:icon_conf
 

And if the Road Warrior says it, it must be true..
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,481
Tokens
Sounds like you are ready to quit gambling...JMO
 

To be the best, you have to beat the best
Joined
Oct 20, 2000
Messages
2,608
Tokens
I know it's not just me that thinks these results are pathetic, even with the posts thus far.

It's not a matter of quitting gambling, it's a matter of becoming less interested in the sport itself as the officiating is beyond terrible. This is speaking merely as a fan.
 

Triple digit silver kook
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
13,697
Tokens
IMHO Too much money involved for games to be totally honest.

Such is life.

Actually, with ESPN and other TV, the games are probably more honest today than previous decades without such coverage and scrutiny.

:money:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,312
Tokens
You can add "World Cup Soccer" to that list. The US was sure hosed with that first bogus red card, and all the yellows. Guy just couldn't stop blowing that whistle.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Watch hockey then. Officiating missed a few calls, but nothing blatantly favoring any teams as proven by who got to the finals.

It's Nate ROBINSON by the way.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
steeser,

great post in your blog, casual fans cant relate, they dont understand what they are watching 99% of the time, and that is who posted the negative comments about your post.

I dont think it comes down to games being fixed necessarily its more of a sub conscious thing or a popularity contest, most officials were not great competitors.

Officials are hired by freinds and family its a good ole boy network, and people go into it to be part of the network, not to get calls correct. Refs want to keep the majority happy.

People want to belong to something, the best refs are loner types.

Its the reason I bet golf and tennis, take the official out of trhe equation.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
BTW,

The average person WANTS to be LIED too. They dont want to hear the truth.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
I think officiating in just about every sport is bad. Is it because they are under so much scrutiny from the fans and the league offices? Is it because the games are rigged? Is being a ref harder than we think it is? Hard to say - but there's no doubt that you can hardly watch a game these days without the refs botching calls left and right. The NBA finals and entire playoffs were horrendous

Here is a great recent column by Bill Simmons about this subject in the NBA: He always calls it like it is

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060620
 

WVU

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2000
Messages
11,648
Tokens
Sports are for entertainment. If you are not entertained when you watch them then you should probably change the channel and watch something else.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
steeser, i agree with you on everything you said...except for the white sox call. that ump was not showing favoritism...he just screwed up. besides, that call did not change the outcome of the series. the sox would not be denied.

the calls in ncaa hoops are terrible..especially in duke home games. the nfl is a joke and that superbowl turned me off the nfl forever. i didnt watch very much of the nba finals but, i know the same stuff goes on there.
 

And if the Road Warrior says it, it must be true..
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,481
Tokens
IMO the officiating is the same as it was 5 years ago...it never changes or gets better. There will ALWAYS be missed calls or calls that favor a team...so one must adjust their betting habits in order to make $$ at this...JMO
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,114
Messages
13,448,589
Members
99,393
Latest member
jaybone34
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com