Online Gambling bill up for vote this week - ACT NOW

Search

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
As most already know, the House will be voting on the online gaming bills this coming week. Please take the time to contact your representative and tell them how you fell. If you have already contacted them, send them another email. The only way we can get through to these people is to threaten them with their jobs. If the mods could sticky this and encourage people to act that would be great. I do not know why the Rx has been so passive on the subject. The Rx stands to lose a lot of money on this issue. Here is the link to find/write your representative: http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Here is the letter I sent:

Please vote against upcoming legislation that would prohibit internet gambling. I am a hard working, tax paying citizen that should have the right to do whatever I choose with my hard earned dollars. I voted for you in the past, but if you vote for this anti-gamibling bill I will be extremely dissatisfied and will be voting against you - and I will coerce all of my acquaintances to do the same. I feel very strongly about this. It is not so much about internet gambling as it is about freedom of choice. The basic principle that monitoring what American citizens do in their own home with their own money on their own time should not be the federal government's responsibility. Thank you for your time.

Here is a pre -written letter from the Poker Players Alliance:

I am writing to urge you to oppose pending legislation that would limit the rights of individuals to play poker online and ask that you support alternative, bi-partisan, legislation that would establish a federal commission to study online gambling.

Very soon the full House of Representatives will consider H.R. 4777 introduced by Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Vir., that would effectively outlaw the great game of poker on the Internet.
As an avid poker player, I feel strongly that this bill and any other legislation which would deny Americans the right to play a game of skill such as poker on the Internet, seriously and egregiously violate my personal freedoms.

Poker is a unique American game enjoyed by more than 70 million people in this country. Recently, the popularity of poker has exploded and the game has extended to the Internet variety that allows people from all over the country – and in fact all over the world -- to match their wits and intellect in this true game of skill. According to Ipsos, a global market research firm, more than 23 million Americans now play poker online! The possibility of the government stripping this activity away from me, and millions of my fellow Americans, is unacceptable.

It is important to note that a recent Wall Street Journal poll found that 84 percent oppose federal efforts to ban online gambling. Americans are seeking a more reasonable approach to Internet poker. One such tact would be to tax and regulate it here in the United States, as we do with brick and mortar casinos. Representatives Jon Porter, R-Nev., Shelly Berkley, R-Nev., and Jim Gibbons, R-Nev. recently introduced H.R. 5474, the Internet Gambling Study Commission Act that would enable the government to examine the possibility of regulating and taxing online gambling, rather than an outright prohibition.

This legislation is a more responsible and reasonable approach to public policy than an outright poker ban. I strongly believe that a thorough examination by this commission will clarify many of the gross misconceptions about Internet poker. I am confident that the commission’s study will show that a tax and regulate approach to online poker—similar to the approach used for land-based gambling—will ensure a safe and regulated environment for Americans to play on the Internet. In addition, this tack will allow state and federal governments to reap significant tax revenues from what is currently a multi-billion dollar industry. Some of this money could be wisely spent on public education and services for problem gamblers.

From average citizens to presidents, generals, members of Congress, and Supreme Court justices, Americans have been playing poker for centuries, making it a rich part of our cultural heritage. Today, the evolution of game on the Internet should not be restricted by overarching government interference.

I urge you to take these concerns into consideration and oppose H.R. 4777 that will make outlaws of poker players who enjoy the game online.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
Congressman Barney Frank Appears on PocketFives Podcast- Press Release

PR Web
June 1, 2006

NASHVILLE, TN (PRWEB) May 27, 2006 -– Online poker’s booming popularity has led many in Washington, D.C. and around the country to ponder what, if any, role the government should take in the industry. Proposed in the Senate by John Kyl (R-AZ) and in the House by Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act could change the landscape of the online gambling community completely by holding gamblers liable for making picks on their favorite professional sports team, folding their cards after a raise, and hitting their blackjack hands over the Internet.
Recently, Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) joined the PocketFives.com weekly Podcast to discuss his views on the recent legislation. The Podcast is available at www.pocketfives.com. Interviewed by PocketFives.com co-owner Adam Small, Congressman Frank’s comments illustrate a growing divide in Congress: “I think [the legislation is a great infringement on liberty. When it comes to an individual decision on how to spend your own time and money, that’s not my position. That’s not my business. I am skeptical of people who want to protect people from themselves.”

Congressman Frank likened the online gambling ban to the Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (Prohibition), which was ratified in 1919: “In a free society, it’s very hard to keep people from doing what they want to do themselves.” Following the passage of the Amendment, a black market for alcohol existed for over a dozen years until its repeal in 1933, as society continued to enjoy liquor. This problem of habitual behavior is one which Congressman Frank considers relevant to the current legislation: “There isn’t a human activity I’m aware of that some people don’t do in excess. Some people drive their cars too fast. Some people drink too much. Some small percentage of adults misuses any activity. If that’s a reason do ban it, [the United States would be a very boring place.”

As far as the future of the bill, that is up to the voters of this country: “Members of Congress pay close attention to members of their districts. If everyone wrote to their one Representative and two Senators, and said ‘I will be very dissatisfied and vote against you if you vote for this bill,’ that will go a long way. Make sure you’re a registered voter first.” CardPlayer.com offers a free service that allows anyone who visits the site to send an e-mail to their Representatives and Senators. According to its website, “There are 70 Million Poker Players in the United States. If Congress just hears opposition from a few concerned poker players, it makes a large impact.” To utilize this service, visit www.cardplayer.com and follow the links.

A lobby group called the Poker Players Alliance is currently helping online gamblers raiser their voices at the forthcoming legislation. According to its website, www.pokerplayersalliance.org, the PPA “is dedicated to promoting and protecting America’s favorite pastime.” Their Congressional lobbying, along with correspondence from legislative constituents, can bring an end to the current bills, according to Congressman Frank: “Everyone needs to write their lawmakers. If enough people did this and spoke up, we could stop this legislation.”

For the full Podcast, visit www.pocketfives.com. The site would like to thank Congressman Frank and his staff for allowing its users time to learn about this important legislation and what can be done to halt its progress. The weekly Podcast featuring Congressman Frank is now available from the website, www.pocketfives.com.

PocketFives.com is a website dedicated to the discussion and advancement of online poker based in Nashville, Tennessee. It has over 14,000 members and includes public discussion forums, exclusive content written by some of online poker’s biggest superstars, a player database where members can learn about their peers, and a weekly half-hour online radio show. For interview requests, please contact Dan Cypra at (615) 292-7016.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Why does this BARNEY FRANK character appear one of the very few with an ounce of commonsense on this issue?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
Everyone on this forum should be doing this and passing it along to their friends.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
Check in today and this thread is on page 2 with a whopping 75 views. Amazing how so many of you are so passive on the subject, especially the OWNERS OF THIS SITE!

Article today on Yahoo about the ban. Take the 5 minutes and write your rep: http://www.yahoo.com/s/343167
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
If the Rx teamed up with other online gaming sites and poker sites and organized a mass protest, it would have a HUGE effect. If thousands and thousands came out and frankly stated that if you vote for the bill then we will vote you out of office, tell me they wouldn't listen. The lack of organization and lack of a voice from the gamers is what is discouraging
 

I think I want my money back!
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
41,267
Tokens
I sent my response in.

Im very pissed by this issue being pushed to the front of all these other more important matters.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
23
Tokens
Poker King Jim
I want to thank you for motivating me to do something about this mess.
I have been stewing over this issue and following it very closely since Kyl first started with this nonsense a few years back.I sent my letter and had a few friends do the same as well all have various accounts.As a horseracing guy,the thought of having to play without the rebates is enough to give my agata.Lets hope our voices are heard.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,208
Tokens
I sent one to my representative about 6 weeks ago. I have also been frustrated that the RX has been so passive on the subject.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
1,808
Tokens
JAYBIRD0711 said:
I sent one to my representative about 6 weeks ago. I have also been frustrated that the RX has been so passive on the subject.

rx is passive because most of the members are recreational betters like myself who can do something else if they ban online gambling.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
dr03 said:
rx is passive because most of the members are recreational betters like myself who can do something else if they ban online gambling.

yeah, i am was thinking of taking up knitting anyway.

i think RX members are passive because they don't get the ramifications of the bill. Personally i think there is a good chance this bill never actually passes both houses, but i think most people here would rather have the option to bet online if they wanted to.
 

"I like ketchup. It's like tomato wine."
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
10,015
Tokens
I copy and pasted what you wrote jim and added this.....


Taxing the offshore industry is the answer, not abolishing it. Just as prohibition, people will find other means and those means won't be able to be taxed!
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
dr03 said:
rx is passive because most of the members are recreational betters like myself who can do something else if they ban online gambling.

Good point. Maybe the owners of the Rx can start up a knitting class and primetime can be the knitting guru. I'm not talking about the members, I am talking about the people that are making gobs of money from this site. What would the Rx be without internet gambling? Nothing


I really think people are underestimating the impact this bill could have. Way too many people with wishful thinking. If every single person that enjoys and utilizes online gambling (millions) stood up and made their voice heard and made threats to vote people out of office, there is no chance in hell this would go through. The public still controls who is in office. It's really the only control we have
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
GUYS its going to pass the HOUSE for sure 100% tommorrow we all know that it is a given

but it does NOT MEAN JACK SHIT if the Senate does not pass it also!!!!!!!!!!!


WHY worry NOW ....worry if it ever passes the senate and from what I read all the time on this site and others that is VERY unlikely to happen so what the HOUSE does DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING!


AM I the only one that sees that fact...we have a 2 house congress


I think WE all know that:icon_conf
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,636
Messages
13,453,140
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com