Brock Landers said:What we need is a Clarence Darrow to argue our side vs the William Jennings Bryan for the Anti-gambling side.
Darrow made Bryan look like a fool for taking EVERYTHING the bible said at face value in the scopes trial, we need the EXACT same thing here. As its the same type of people trying to tell people what to do in this case. There it was the teaching of evolution, here its the "morality" of gambling...
Anyone else see the similarity??