Whos the best Gambling friendly Presidential canidate that may run next year?

CHOPTALK · Jul 17, 2006

I guess the real question is, which contender is least likely to steal are freedoms?

I am ashamed to say I voted for some of these idiots last election. I use to vote republican 90% of the time. But after the last 4 years of freedoms lost, I have changed my ways.

Who is the best man or women for the gambling world?

Fishhead · Jul 17, 2006

Well, not next year, but look no further for your 2012 candidate.

http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=347962&highlight=PRESIDENT

:suomi:

CHOPTALK · Jul 17, 2006

This post has no more to do with politics than talking about the gambling bill everyday.

The politics forums is for strickly politics. Things like border security, the war, abortion etc.....

This question is gambling related, and I feel that it belongs in the offshore forum.

PatPatriot · Jul 17, 2006

Andrew "Dice" Clay

charleslanger · Jul 17, 2006

CHOPTALK said:
This post has no more to do with politics than talking about the gambling bill everyday.

The politics forums is for strickly politics. Things like border security, the war, abortion etc.....

This question is gambling related, and I feel that it belongs in the offshore forum.

I agree-- this should NOT have been moved.

charleslanger · Jul 17, 2006

As far as a realistic candidate: Giuliani, Hillary-- they wouldn't spend their time pursuing / backing it.

ppeter · Jul 17, 2006

Your "best bet" is Hillary. I believe she is card carrying member of the ACLU.

CHOPTALK · Jul 17, 2006

charleslanger said:
As far as a realistic candidate: Giuliani, Hillary-- they wouldn't spend their time pursuing / backing it.

Giuliani is real big into the patriot act. That has alot to do with this money transfer issue that we have sending money offshore.

CHOPTALK · Jul 17, 2006

charleslanger said:
I agree-- this should NOT have been moved.

They are never consistant with there rules.

One day you will have someone asking the question "What did you eat for dinner? in the offshore forum and it stays. Then the next day you have gambling question that gets sent to the politics forum.

Its not like im asking a question about medicare or social security. This is a gambling question.

levistep · Jul 17, 2006

charleslanger said:
I agree-- this should NOT have been moved.

Jeez, you guys make it seem like the Politics forum is the worst place in the world.

ppeter said:
Your "best bet" is Hillary. I believe she is card carrying member of the ACLU.

I'd rather give up poker than have Hillary be president.

charleslanger said:
As far as a realistic candidate: Giuliani, Hillary-- they wouldn't spend their time pursuing / backing it.

Don't think Bush is pursuing it at all either, but he'd sign the bill if it gets passed, and that's all the matters.

Dawoofdaddy · Jul 17, 2006

levistep said:
I'd rather give up poker than have Hillary be president.

I am rather sure I agree with ^^^.

Sports betting is not my entire life....I could live without it.

Im not going back to solely playing with local books...Ill probably quit if internet gambling becomes too troublesome.

Choose among various 3rd party candidates and thats more than likely the best vote.

:suomi:

Willie99 · Jul 17, 2006

Fishhead

Dante · Jul 17, 2006

Ill move it back for you chop relax... did not realize it was such a big dea..its all good now man :103631605

oldmanTED · Jul 17, 2006

If any gambling bill were to get as far as the President's desk, no matter who or what party, it would be rubber stamped. No President is going to veto a bill like this. Sorry to say it, but more important issues fall under the possibility of being vetoed.

The better question is which Representatives and Senators are up for re-election and how would they vote on a gambling bill. We already know how the current House members voted by name. Question is which Senators support such a bill and are up for re-election. If the seats that are up for re-election can be replaced with members that don't support a gambling bill all the better.

5teamparlay · Jul 17, 2006

It wouldn't be JEB BUSH, The state of GAMBLING in Florida is a joke, but i like it.

wilheim · Jul 17, 2006

Just for the record - moving threads is subjective and there are no real clear cut criteria for threads like this one. The fact that the thread talks about presidential candidates certainly makes it political under any circumstances.

The Rx. has any number of moderators working at any given time and it is impossible to have everyone moderate the same way. Something I may move Dante may feel is fine where it is. There is just no way to cover every possible thread title and subject beforehand the process is always subjective and up to a moderaors judgement.

I understand posters don't like their threads being moved and wish we did not have to do so but the reality is moving threads is necessary to keep the Offshore Forum from being over run with to much off topic materieal.

wil.

Journeyman · Jul 17, 2006

I would never go back to using a bookie for one, back then I bet much less per bet than now, I really would not feel comfortable betting any real money with any bookie....I would think many would also be in this same boat.

charleslanger · Jul 17, 2006

<TABLE class=tborder id=post3027660 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>levistep<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_3027660", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Senior

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The house with no numbers
Posts: 2,632

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_3027660>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by charleslanger
I agree-- this should NOT have been moved.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Jeez, you guys make it seem like the Politics forum is the worst place in the world.

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by ppeter
Your "best bet" is Hillary. I believe she is card carrying member of the ACLU.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I'd rather give up poker than have Hillary be president.

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by charleslanger
As far as a realistic candidate: Giuliani, Hillary-- they wouldn't spend their time pursuing / backing it.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Don't think Bush is pursuing it at all either, but he'd sign the bill if it gets passed, and that's all the matters.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=alt2>

</TD><TD class=alt1 align=right></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>1. Can get awful dangerous in there-- i'm scared to tread there meself.

2.Ha Ha!

3. The White House has released an announcement backing the bill.

charleslanger · Jul 17, 2006

<TABLE class=tborder id=post3027645 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>CHOPTALK<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_3027645", true); </SCRIPT>
Who Dat, , Who Dat say they gonna beat them Saints!!!!!

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LOUISIANA
Posts: 9,325

</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_3027645>

<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by charleslanger
As far as a realistic candidate: Giuliani, Hillary-- they wouldn't spend their time pursuing / backing it.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Giuliani is real big into the patriot act. That has alot to do with this money transfer issue that we have sending
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Yeah, but individual lines in it can/will always be opposed by just about everyone....
don't forget G started out as a Dem....

CHOPTALK · Jul 17, 2006

5teamparlay said:
It wouldn't be JEB BUSH, The state of GAMBLING in Florida is a joke, but i like it.

Ive had enough bush for awhile.

Wait a min, that did not sound right did it?:lolBIG:

Whos the best Gambling friendly Presidential canidate that may run next year?

Member

Active member

Member

New member

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS

Rx Wizard

Member

Member

New member

Triple digit silver kook

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Active member

Professional At All Times

Member

New member

Banned

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page