Mofome Plays For Monday. $$$

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

LAA -$1.77 (3 units)
stl -$1.12
sd +$1.04 (2 units)
oak +$1.02
det -$1.11
det rl +$1.45

looks like as good a day as there has been in terms of the values the linesmakers at pinny have given us. i dont like chalk but i have Ana as a -280 and they gave us -177...

will update the record later on, had a decent sunday looking to get back over 60 units for this 40 days or so

bol guys

:money:

Vyrus858 · Jul 24, 2006

tailing you on every play for the same amount, EXCEPT THE PADRES..I cannot bet on this team, I will lose if I bet on or against them, and I will not bring my "home team curse" into your solid capping...played Anaheim to win 3 units, and 1 unit each on OAK, St Louis (gonna rde this money train until they give me a reason ot too) and Tigers RL.so basically you have 2 unit play on the tigers as well correct, judging that you playedboth the mL and the RL....gonna tailyou as ussual, but lay off your Pads bet like I stated above so you dont get my bad mojo...GL, really love this Anahieim game, and now even moe so with what your #'s show...gl to us

Vyrus858 · Jul 24, 2006

if you like a card this much, then I am on for the ride....1 unit plays on Oak, Det RL and St Louis like you played...3 units on the Halos -185, and even a half unit parlay on Tigers Ml and Angels....LETS DO THIS

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

sounds great vyrus, i can tell u 100% that if you play everything as listed for the rest of the year you will have more money than you do now. lets have a great day tomorrow and start the week off right.

thanks, as always, for the kind words and lets see if we cant make another 20 units by the end of August or possibly sooner.

:toast:

Arodd · Jul 24, 2006

think one of the reasons LAA isn't a bigger favorite is because TB put some serious runs on the board this weekend....whereas LAA has only averaged 3.6 runs a game in their past 5 matchups, 4 of which were against KC, not exactly known for their pitching prowess (or whatever other word you want to use).

Haven't scored more than 4 runs in a game since then...Lackey is the man but any pitcher can be beat when his team isn't scoring. Hope they put up some runs for your sake...gl with the card man

teazeman · Jul 24, 2006

gl tonight MO!!! $$$$$$$$$$$

silver7 · Jul 24, 2006

Realy Appreciate It When

you post early. I hear what dseth is saying, but I`d LOVE to play the RL w/LAA? Thoughts! BOL as usual!

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

KC also held down Boston with boston winning a couple 1-0 games in boston, they've been pitching better of late. TB put up a lot of runs on Russ ortiz and R lopez, a couple of guys that arent MLB players. seo has had a whip of 1.80 or higher in 3 of his last 4 and lacky has been lights out aside from one inning in clev.many reasons for the 3 unit play imo

thanks men and bol to the two of u

randolph · Jul 24, 2006

mofome said:
i can tell u 100% that if you play everything as listed for the rest of the year you will have more money than you do now.

Yeah, one dollar more! :missingte :missingte :missingte

Romanowski · Jul 24, 2006

Best of Luck Mofome:toast:

WizardofWins · Jul 24, 2006

Best of Luck tonight Mo..............:toast:

Addict101 · Jul 24, 2006

You feel more confident on Oakland or St. Louis? Looking to make a play on one of them...Thanks

TKE683 · Jul 24, 2006

I'm following on the Padres.
The Angels i'll wait to see the ump, Lackey has been great but his problem, as in his last start when he starts getting pinched by the ump, he seems to lose it.

Yogi1964 · Jul 24, 2006

Big Card tonight....Good Luck with It :dancefool

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

thanks men

:toast:

i like stl a bit more than i do oak, addict

Addict101 · Jul 24, 2006

Thanks a lot man, I'm on the Cards lets cash it baby!

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

:money:

-Newman- · Jul 24, 2006

Best Of Luck Today Mofome !!!

:toast:

I Don't Know If It's Good That Are Picks Are Very Similar, But I'll Guess We'll Find Out Shortly !!!

:money:

mofome · Jul 24, 2006

:smoking:

lol thank u sr. BOL to u as well

Arodd · Jul 24, 2006

yeah not disagreeingw ith the plays just sayin i think thats why the line might have been alot different than what you initialyl thought. you're all over this one