Iceman Inside

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
2,401
Tokens
Based on what was written with your analysis the other day, just at a glance with one game would you say a play would be on the Braves since it opened around 160 and is already down to -145? Just want to see if I am catching on.....the public is on the pirates. I know it is still early but if this were a closing number closer to game time.
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
11,731
Tokens
passingthewind said:
Based on what was written with your analysis the other day, just at a glance with one game would you say a play would be on the Braves since it opened around 160 and is already down to -145? Just want to see if I am catching on.....the public is on the pirates. I know it is still early but if this were a closing number closer to game time.

yes this would be one indeed. I haven't paid attention to the lines yet today. I did just notice an Atlanta RL for +115 at trojan that move 10% off opener and bet it. But yes this is getting steammed like crazy and the value is there or getting very close to it.

This is where you have to be careful I advise you too wait on Atlanta (I have opener closer to -150 so I am waiting for -135, which maybe out there I haven't looked very hard)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
251
Tokens
Ice, what book are you using for opening numbers. Pinny opened at Atl.-155 so a strike price would be -139 if using that book. Thanks
 

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
1,755
Tokens
This is where I get lost................
I have the majority on ATLANTA............77% with this line moving down.
That doesn't seem right - even though it fits this "system". And it is the same thing that happened with the LAA line last night...........with the large majority on LA, the line went from -140 to -125..............in essense making the line more tempting to the public. But the public was already tempted enough to bet the line at 140..............so why lower it???
Now we have the public team that has been playing HOT, and they have their line being made even more tempting????

Was up????? :icon_conf
 

Degenerate
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
724
Tokens
BIG Wave said:
This is where I get lost................
I have the majority on ATLANTA............77% with this line moving down.
That doesn't seem right - even though it fits this "system". And it is the same thing that happened with the LAA line last night...........with the large majority on LA, the line went from -140 to -125..............in essense making the line more tempting to the public. But the public was already tempted enough to bet the line at 140..............so why lower it???
Now we have the public team that has been playing HOT, and they have their line being made even more tempting????

Was up????? :icon_conf

I was thinking the same thing...regardless...I still think ATL and Smoltz are a damn good value with these numbers...what WTF is going on...????
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
251
Tokens
Ice, just read the other posts about the method so no need to respond.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,706
Messages
13,453,654
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com