Seattle-Anaheim

canes2001 · Aug 18, 2006

Yes, that is right, Seattle Mariners and the Anaheim Angels (sorry LA is reserved for the Dodgers). Anyway, someone please tell me why this line is so low. I mean Weaver on the mound for the Angels, M's have lost 8 in a row, all signs point to an Angels win. Is this a trap? :icon_conf

Presto · Aug 18, 2006

If Seattle has a good pithcer, it is Hernandez. When the guy is on, he is a strkeout machine. He also gets good run support from the offense.
I am looking at the over.

Anonymous1 · Aug 18, 2006

all wagers for 50 at oly
laa team total over 4
laa no run 1st inning
laa -143

lad team total over 4.5
lad no run 1st inning
lad -102

and thats how you become a homer on a friday night with jak shit to do other than downing a few...gl

gtc08 · Aug 18, 2006

felix is better then weaver IMO.

cadillacman · Aug 18, 2006

Ichiro sitting this one out

canes2001 · Aug 18, 2006

Thanks for the replies, I'm still confused on this one, think I'll take the Giants and stay away from this one...

gtc08 · Aug 18, 2006

i think line is low because felix can be dominant vs. that lineup and theyve had success vs. the angels in the past.

FatTony · Aug 18, 2006

canes2001 said:
Yes, that is right, Seattle Mariners and the Anaheim Angels (sorry LA is reserved for the Dodgers). Anyway, someone please tell me why this line is so low. I mean Weaver on the mound for the Angels, M's have lost 8 in a row, all signs point to an Angels win. Is this a trap?

I agree it's a trap so I took the M's. Especially after Weaver winning as a road dog against the yanks in his last start. This line should be -170.