Senate focus will be security, Frist says

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,361
Tokens
Hopefully, this implies that the Senate will have even less time to focus on internet gambling than Frist had thought going into the break.

http://www.ajc.com/thursday/content/epaper/editions/thursday/news_44de5436a2ed20ab003c.html

Senate focus will be security, Frist says
[SIZE=-2]Tom Baxter - Staff[/SIZE]

[FONT=geneva,arial,helvetica,sans-serif][SIZE=-2]Thursday, August 24, 2006[/SIZE][/FONT]


[FONT=arial,helvetica,geneva,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]In a signal that Republicans are returning to security issues as this fall's elections near, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said Wednesday that the Senate, currently in recess, will focus on homeland security measures when it resumes work in September. [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,geneva,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Frist said recent reports of terrorist activity, including a plot he said involved 11 American cities "that could have been a reality, with a loss of life greater than 9/11," were a "wake-up call" for a more concentrated focus on domestic anti-terrorist measures.

Frist, in a meeting with editors and reporters at the Journal-Constitution, said he was informed of the threat a couple of weeks ago by government sources. He did not provide details about the threat --- apparently separate from recent allegations of a plot to bomb planes en route to the United States from England --- and declined to name the cities, but said all "are where tourists would be coming and that are popular cities."
His plan to have the Senate focus on security comes as President Bush also is emphasizing the issue.

"We're talking about making sure we have the tools we need to protect ourselves and you'll see that elevated in September when I come back," Frist said.

Specifically, he said he wants the Senate to take action to address the recent federal court decision rejecting a National Security Agency surveillance program as unconstitutional. Restoring the surveillance program is also a Bush administration priority.

The Republican leader said the Senate also will take up the security of the nation's ports --- "the one issue out there which has to be addressed" --- but didn't detail what action he wants the Senate to take.

Frist expressed doubt that Congress, in its few working weeks remaining before it recesses to prepare for the November elections, will reach agreement on that thorny issue of immigration. He acknowledged he may have brought up the immigration bill this year "too close to the election" to avoid having it become a political issue.

Frist, who is leaving the Senate when his term expires in January, is widely expected to seek the GOP presidential nomination in 2008. Asked Wednesday if he is likely to run, he replied, "I think so, because of the issues we've talked about here."

[/SIZE][/FONT]
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Many good things for gambling have happened since they left for vacation.

1. Castro is dying.
2. The whole planes out of the UK thing.
3. The court shooting down Bush's eavesdropping.

Now there are 3 extra things for the senate to haggle about before they can move on to gambling next month!

-Sean
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
kwalder said:
Hopefully, this implies that the Senate will have even less time to focus on internet gambling than Frist had thought going into the break.

http://www.ajc.com/thursday/content/epaper/editions/thursday/news_44de5436a2ed20ab003c.html

Senate focus will be security, Frist says
[SIZE=-2]Tom Baxter - Staff[/SIZE]

[FONT=geneva,arial,helvetica,sans-serif][SIZE=-2]Thursday, August 24, 2006[/SIZE][/FONT]


[FONT=arial,helvetica,geneva,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]In a signal that Republicans are returning to security issues as this fall's elections near, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said Wednesday that the Senate, currently in recess, will focus on homeland security measures when it resumes work in September. [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,geneva,sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Frist said recent reports of terrorist activity, including a plot he said involved 11 American cities "that could have been a reality, with a loss of life greater than 9/11," were a "wake-up call" for a more concentrated focus on domestic anti-terrorist measures.

Frist, in a meeting with editors and reporters at the Journal-Constitution, said he was informed of the threat a couple of weeks ago by government sources. He did not provide details about the threat --- apparently separate from recent allegations of a plot to bomb planes en route to the United States from England --- and declined to name the cities, but said all "are where tourists would be coming and that are popular cities."
His plan to have the Senate focus on security comes as President Bush also is emphasizing the issue.

"We're talking about making sure we have the tools we need to protect ourselves and you'll see that elevated in September when I come back," Frist said.

Specifically, he said he wants the Senate to take action to address the recent federal court decision rejecting a National Security Agency surveillance program as unconstitutional. Restoring the surveillance program is also a Bush administration priority.

The Republican leader said the Senate also will take up the security of the nation's ports --- "the one issue out there which has to be addressed" --- but didn't detail what action he wants the Senate to take.

Frist expressed doubt that Congress, in its few working weeks remaining before it recesses to prepare for the November elections, will reach agreement on that thorny issue of immigration. He acknowledged he may have brought up the immigration bill this year "too close to the election" to avoid having it become a political issue.

Frist, who is leaving the Senate when his term expires in January, is widely expected to seek the GOP presidential nomination in 2008. Asked Wednesday if he is likely to run, he replied, "I think so, because of the issues we've talked about here."

[/SIZE][/FONT]
:party: :party: :party:

thanks Kwalder for the update....
 

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
2,455
Tokens
I will take a look into the future and say that in time (but not this year) protecting people from internet gambling is a national secuurity concern.
Dont be surprised.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
On the other hand, it means we get three months of hearing about how scared we should all be, and how the republicans are the only ones watching out back.

*yawn*
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
Yogi Berra had a lot of sayings. He was brilliant and folks didn't get it in his day. They use to laugh at him. But one of my favorite's Yogism's is" "it ain't over till it's over"


If you know what I'm saying about Yogi--give me 2 thumbs up---You're an old timer like me!:103631605 :103631605
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
Sugarbear said:
I will take a look into the future and say that in time (but not this year) protecting people from internet gambling is a national secuurity concern.
Dont be surprised.
Disagree SB if it does not get passed this year I think it will be MUCH , MUCH Harder next term ...they will push for some type of " study" on it for a few yrs from what I read a few months ago

as this will be the 2 or 3rd time it failed ( I think)

the Study that some of the senate congressman presented may take more flight NEXT congress...

IMHO
 

New member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
6,266
Tokens
I voted GOP all my life, but I think they're becoming more annoying because of some Fanatical Christians Right Taliban groups. Mind you, I'm a Gop Voter, Sunday church goer (but non-bibble thumper), but it's getting too much and am fed up with these nuts.

The Internet Gambing became a target, now they're going after the hotel chains to ban Adult In Rooom movies. When will they stop?

Will they go after people wearing thongs, Bikinis, crotch-length mini-skirts next? :smoker2:
 

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
2,455
Tokens
Dante said:
Disagree SB if it does not get passed this year I think it will be MUCH , MUCH Harder next term ...they will push for some type of " study" on it for a few yrs from what I read a few months ago

as this will be the 2 or 3rd time it failed ( I think)

the Study that some of the senate congressman presented may take more flight NEXT congress...

IMHO


Its not a bill, its a change in language. Bookmaking has been lifted to the level of commiting international crimes. They cant make a law to stop it, so they will change there stance and call a national security issue.

With all these funds flowing out they cant keep an eye on, its there next move. They wont need a law. This stance will allow them to go after the internet providers and call them aider and abetters unless they diable links to gaming. Also I believe they will eventually go after Microsoft since its illegal to recieve or transmit gambling information in the state of Washington. If he Feds sign off on indictment of a person who used the internet in Washington to gamble online and IE was a facilatator they want to go after, ITS a different ball game and where they are headed.

They are changing tatics and will be strongarming a lot of places after the fall elections or no later than the spring for sure.

Here is a dirty little secret givin to me that your GOV does not want you to know. Just go back to dial up and route thru a service provider in any country of your choice. Nothing they can do but threaten the CEO's of those laces.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
tbonestk said:
I voted GOP all my life, but I think they're becoming more annoying because of some Fanatical Christians Right Taliban groups. Mind you, I'm a Gop Voter, Sunday church goer (but non-bibble thumper), but it's getting too much and am fed up with these nuts.

The Internet Gambing became a target, now they're going after the hotel chains to ban Adult In Rooom movies. When will they stop?

Will they go after people wearing thongs, Bikinis, crotch-length mini-skirts next? :smoker2:

Those things are too small a target. They will work on getting your kids to pray in school first.

They say high on their agenda is flag burning and same-sex marriage. Geez are those REALLY that important and crucial business for our leaders to accomplish, or just more grandstanding to get a few more votes? If we are a nation who elects our leaders on such meaningless shit that doesn't affect the vast majority of us, what does that say about our voting intelligence?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,361
Tokens
Dante said:
thanks Kwalder for the update....
Dante, you are certainly welcome.

I try to limit these updates to news that affects the internet gambling bill although they tend to lead toward a discussion on Politics.
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
If it does not get done now, it is done gone for the forseable future.

First off, the house, senate, and pres will not all be republican after elections.

Second by next year, the WTO will have enacted sanctions against the USA and in light of that happening, it will be much less likely to pass.

-Sean
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Am I the only one here who is 99.5% sure the U.S. feds will NEVER outlaw internet gambling?

It's all posturing and grandstanding, IMHO.

One of the most well paid populations on the planet is those people who work inside the Beltway in Washington DC.

And you can be sure that a lot of those folks enjoy internet gambling - either casinos or sportsbooks.

The feds will never actually outlaw something that so many of their co-workers and staff do on a routine basis.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
barman said:
Am I the only one here who is 99.5% sure the U.S. feds will NEVER outlaw internet gambling?

Nope, I agree with you, too.

Imagine that!

:>Grin>

(I still owe you an email reply ... will do that tonight.)
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
I agree. The feds rarely pass a completely unenforceable law and I dont think this one will ever get passed.

Basically, a few religious bible thumpers have made a big name for themselves trying to pass this thing. Most the House simply doesnt care and voted ok to let the senate decide.

Now the senate simply wont decide.

-Sean
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,529
Messages
13,452,322
Members
99,421
Latest member
Garryter12
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com