Lions flying to California and playing game on same day

Iceman · Aug 25, 2006

expect line to get steammed. I got some Oakland -3 +101 last nite.

Iceman · Aug 25, 2006

Line is moving like crazy. Still a chance to lock in a profit, trust me

Journeyman · Aug 25, 2006

Interesting angle!

MrCleo · Aug 25, 2006

i trust ya, i cashed in on Oak at home last weekend and looking for a repeat. very much the same scenario, at home playing a horrible team, and in this case a horrible team flying in late with Brooks getting extended playing time
:suomi:

ClipJoint · Aug 25, 2006

MrCleo said:
with Brooks getting extended playing time

If that is not enough to make you fade the Raiders, I don't know what is. :missingte

MrCleo · Aug 25, 2006

Clip Joint said:
If that is not enough to make you fade the Raiders, I don't know what is. :missingte

lol, as i typed that, i told myself a reply like that was coming, but if you have seen the back-ups for the Raiders, you know it still means something. I've only backed Brooks and Oakland once, first half and for the game, last week, and both bets won. Brooks played a lot better last week compared to his first game and it is a brand new offense for him, which is why their giving him the extra time. But better him in there than the back-up, i forget his name at the moment but he's a lot worse, and we may have not thought that was possible.

ClipJoint · Aug 25, 2006

MrCleo said:
But better him in there than the back-up, i forget his name at the moment but he's a lot worse, and we may have not thought that was possible.

I disagree with you there...in fact, there is a QB controversy brewing in Oakland as Andrew Walter may be the guy. I'd rather have my money on him anyday over Brooks.

MrCleo · Aug 25, 2006

i didn't say it right, but I'm fine with Walter in the game, he had 2 TDs last week, but the 3rd string guy has been turnover city. The longer brooks plays, the more likely that 3rd guy, tatisopo? will not see the field much.