Reply from my House rep. regarding HR 4411

Search

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,954
Tokens
Dear Josh,
Thank you for contacting me regarding H.R. 4411, the Internet Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue and welcome the opportunity to respond.

H.R. 4411 seeks to prevent the use of certain payment instruments, credit cards, and fund transfers for unlawful Internet gambling by updating the 1961 Wire Act to clarify the forms of lawful communications, and specify which gambling businesses are covered by federal law. Internet Gambling is already illegal. Credit card companies, on a voluntary basis, already utilize mechanisms to stop this activity. H.R. 4411 does not change the legality of any gambling-related activity in the united states. For instance, if use of Internet in connection with dog racing is approved by state regulatory agencies does not violate any Federal law, then it is allowed under the new legislation.

I voted in support of H.R. 4411 because we as a society needed to address the social and economic impact associated with problem gambling. Presently, a $12 billion off-shore gaming industry evades our nation's laws. Efforts to prevent underage and pathological gambling are particularly challenging due to the high level of anonymity afforded to Internet gamblers. It is important to note, this bill does not set out to attack adult on-line gamers or poker players individually. However, the bottom line is that this is, and always has been, against the law.

H.R. 4411 was agreed to in the House on July 11, 2006 and awaits further legislative review within the Senate. Please know that I will keep your thoughts in mind should additional legislation regarding Internet gambling come before me on the House floor.

Again, thank you for contacting me. It is an honor to serve you in Washington. If you would like more information on issues, or would like to share your thoughts with me via e-mail, you may visit my website at sullivan.house.gov. Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you have further concerns on federal leglislation or problems.

Sincerely,
John Sullivan
Member of Congress
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
I would reply:

Since I believe my Congressman should actually know the laws he writes about, I will be asking every person I know to vote against you the next time you run for office.

-Sean
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
159
Tokens
guitarjosh said:
Dear Josh,
Thank you for contacting me regarding H.R. 4411, the Internet Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue and welcome the opportunity to respond.

H.R. 4411 seeks to prevent the use of certain payment instruments, credit cards, and fund transfers for unlawful Internet gambling by updating the 1961 Wire Act to clarify the forms of lawful communications, and specify which gambling businesses are covered by federal law. Internet Gambling is already illegal. Credit card companies, on a voluntary basis, already utilize mechanisms to stop this activity. H.R. 4411 does not change the legality of any gambling-related activity in the united states. For instance, if use of Internet in connection with dog racing is approved by state regulatory agencies does not violate any Federal law, then it is allowed under the new legislation.

I voted in support of H.R. 4411 because we as a society needed to address the social and economic impact associated with problem gambling. Presently, a $12 billion off-shore gaming industry evades our nation's laws. Efforts to prevent underage and pathological gambling are particularly challenging due to the high level of anonymity afforded to Internet gamblers. It is important to note, this bill does not set out to attack adult on-line gamers or poker players individually. However, the bottom line is that this is, and always has been, against the law.

H.R. 4411 was agreed to in the House on July 11, 2006 and awaits further legislative review within the Senate. Please know that I will keep your thoughts in mind should additional legislation regarding Internet gambling come before me on the House floor.

Again, thank you for contacting me. It is an honor to serve you in Washington. If you would like more information on issues, or would like to share your thoughts with me via e-mail, you may visit my website at sullivan.house.gov. Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you have further concerns on federal leglislation or problems.

Sincerely,
John Sullivan
Member of Congress
Nice Josh. If more did this kind of thing the Senators will know what the public really thinks and think twice about passing the new Bill.

Let's not forget today's the day to join the Poker Players Aliance in phoning in to Senators using their 1-800 number:

http://forum2.therx.com/showthread.php?t=403661
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,361
Tokens
Well, at least you received a non-generic reply.

I'm curious how this Congressman rationalizes addressing the "social and economic impact associated with problem gambling" by only prohibiting non-horseracing and non-lottery wagering transactions.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,645
Messages
13,453,267
Members
99,428
Latest member
callgirls
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com