Ann Coulter: Are Videotaped Beheadings Covered by Geneva! (Sionara crybabies!)

Search

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
Life is peachy. The national debate in the country is undergoing yet another paradigm shift. Gas prices are plummeting while Republican poll numbers are on the rise. Both John Zogby and Scott Rasmussen handicapping the individual Senate and House races now concede the best Democrats can hope for is single digit gains in both chambers. Worse, Republicans are just opening up their massive vault, while Howard Dean blew most of the DNC's "war chest" shoring up poll numbers in June and July. The way all the indicators are trending, the rats may even end up losing seats. Of course, anyone who has been following tradesports the last few months would agree with this analysis: it's 2004 all over again, and maybe worse. Get on board -- now!

Listen to the wisdom of James Carville, kids: "if we can't win in this environment, we have to question the whole premise of the party." That's right, by 2008 Hillary will be a John McCain RINO! Rumor has it, moveon.org ("we bought the Democratic party") have booked Hugo Chavez as the DNC 08 Convention keynote speaker!

Oh, and speaking of McCain, "the maverick" (traitor) just blew whatever slim chance he had of winning the GOP nomination for POTUS.

Some things never change. RINOs keep behaving like RINOs, liberals keep losing elections betraying and endangering their own country with their hysteria, and Ann Coulter keeps outdoing herself churning out one gem after another. Somehow, it's just not fair. All the liberal psychos and wussies just can't compete with this type of substantive jam packed wisdom...

************************************************

ARE VIDEOTAPED BEHEADINGS COVERED BY GENEVA?

by Ann Coulter
September 20, 2006

Sen. John McCain has been carrying so much water for his friends in the mainstream media that he now has to state for the record to Republican audiences: "I hold no brief for al-Qaida."

Well, that's a relief.

It turns out, the only reason McCain is demanding that prisoners like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, the beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl and other atrocities — be treated like Martha Stewart facing an insider trading charge is this: "It's all about the United States of America and what is going to happen to Americans who are taken prisoner in future wars."

McCain, along with Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. John Warner — or, as the Times now calls him, the "courtly Virginian" ("***-hag by proxy to Elizabeth Taylor" being beneath his dignity these days) — want terrorists treated like Americans accused of crimes, with full access to classified information against them and a list of the undercover agents involved in their capture. Liberals' interest in protecting classified information started and ended with Valerie Plame.

As Graham explained, he doesn't want procedures used against terrorists at Guantanamo "to become clubs to be used against our people." Actually, clubs would be a step up from videotaped beheadings.

Or as The New York Times wrote in the original weasel talking points earlier this summer: "The Geneva Conventions protect Americans. If this country changes the rules, it's changing the rules for Americans taken prisoner abroad. That is far too high a price to pay so this administration can hang on to its misbegotten policies."

There hasn't been this much railing about the mistreatment of a hostage since Monica Lewinsky was served canapes at the Pentagon City Ritz-Carlton Hotel while being detained by the FBI.

The belief that we can impress the enemy with our magnanimity is an idea that just won't die. It's worse than the idea that paying welfare recipients benefits won't discourage them from working. (Some tiny minority might still seek work.) It's worse than the idea that taxes can be raised endlessly without reducing tax receipts. (As the Laffer Curve illustrates, at some point — a point this country will never reach — taxes could theoretically be cut so much that tax revenues would decline.)

But being nice to enemies is an idea that has never worked, no matter how many times liberals make us do it. It didn't work with the Soviet Union, Imperial Japan, Hitler or the North Vietnamese — enemies notable for being more civilized than the Islamic savages we are at war with today.

By the way, how did the Geneva Conventions work out for McCain at the Hanoi Hilton?

It doesn't even work with the Democrats, whom Bush kept sucking up to his first year in office. No more movie nights at the White House with Teddy Kennedy these days, I'm guessing.

It was this idea (Be nice!) that fueled liberals' rage at Reagan when he vanquished the Soviet Union with his macho "cowboy diplomacy" that was going to get us all blown up. As the Times editorial page hysterically described Reagan's first year in office: "Mr. Reagan looked at the world through gun sights." Yes, he did! And now the Evil Empire is no more.

It was this idiotic idea of being nice to predators that drove liberal crime policies in the '60s and '70s — leading like night into day to unprecedented crime rates. Now these same liberal ninnies want to extend their tender mercies not just to rapists and murderers, but to Islamic terrorists.

Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Ronald Reagan and Winston Churchill had a different idea: Instead of rewarding bad behavior, punish bad behavior. How many times does punishment have to work and coddling have to fail before we never have to hear again that if we treat terrorists well, the terrorists will treat our prisoners well?

Fortunately, history always begins this morning for liberals, so they can keep flogging the same idiotic idea that has never, ever worked: Be nice to our enemies and they will reward us with good behavior.

Never mind trusting liberals with national security. Never mind trusting them with raising kids. These people shouldn't even be allowed to own pets.

If the Democrats and the four pathetic Republicans angling to be called "mavericks" by The New York Times really believe we need to treat captured terrorists nicely in order to ensure that the next American they capture will be well-treated, then why stop at 600-thread-count sheets for the Guantanamo detainees? We must adopt Sharia law.

As McCain might put it, I hold no brief for al-Qaida, but what would better protect Americans they take prisoner than if America went whole hog and became an Islamic republic? On the plus side, we can finally put Rosie O'Donnell in a burka.


COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER

***************************************************

Sionara liberal kooks and cussy crybabies!

:howdy:
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
McCain is old school America, a generation from a bygone age.
The America we used to know.

The present day America is Neocons and the Israel uber alles brigade who are hell bent on dragging the West into a religious Stalingrad in the Middle East.

As far as pussies are concerned this lefty wants lots of nukes in the middle east.
Nuclear proliferation will keep you pussies in your cage, which is exactly where you twisted cheerleading cowards belong.
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,358
Tokens
This is funny. You call people "kooks", while quoting Ann Coulter.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
520
Tokens
bigplay said:
Ann Coulter is David Duke in drag.

LOL! She is funny the way she rips liberals. She is quick on her feet too. I saw the video of two college kids running on stage to throw a pie in her face. Ann high tailed it off stage and the kids missed their target.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
By the way, how did the Geneva Conventions work out for McCain at the Hanoi Hilton?

Ann Coulter is a revolting bitch.

So apparently Coulter believes we should pull out of the Geneva conventions. Why is she afraid to come out and say it? Why is she pussyfooting around it? Use that adam's apples and grow some stones, Ann.
 

Respect My Steez
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
6,453
Tokens
Are beheadings any different than the electric chair? In both cases the executor thought the executee had it coming
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
I'm trying to figure out the difference between their beheadings and our beating them to death inside of a month inside some torture prison or some marine shooting some captive in front of a camera....

There is no difference to someone who is seeing both sides.....there is no moral high ground or monopoly on Geneva rights by either side so who the fuck is anyone kidding bringing up beheadings and how they stand with some rules of conduct followed by neither side?

Be fucking brutally honest about it, admit our own abuses of the Geneva convention and quit claiming to be above the board by showing just what the neckslicers have done.
 

powdered milkman
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
22,984
Tokens
as usual i have nuthin of value to add other than i would love to see ann coulter tortured and then beheaded
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,622
Messages
13,452,998
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com