This is fu*ked up...............

Search

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
5,605
Tokens
Reporters who refused to reveal BALCO leak get prison
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO -- Two San Francisco Chronicle reporters were ordered jailed Thursday for a maximum 18 months, pending an appeal, for refusing to testify about who leaked them secret grand jury testimony from Barry Bonds and other elite athletes.

Lance Williams and Mark Fainaru-Wada published a series of articles and a book based partly on the leaked transcripts of the testimony of Bonds, Jason Giambi and others before a grand jury investigating the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, a Burlingame-based nutritional supplement company exposed as a steroid ring two years ago.

Federal prosecutors asked U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White to send the reporters to prison for the full term of the grand jury investigating the leak, or until they agree to testify.

Williams and Fainaru-Wada have said repeatedly they would go to jail rather than comply with the grand jury's subpoena and reveal their source or sources.

Both sides agreed to stay the ruling by White pending an appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The reporters agreed with the government that they are in contempt of court, but had sought a "nominal monetary fine" and other punishment "short of full blown incarceration," including house arrest and weekend jailing, according to court documents.

Authorities want to charge whoever unlawfully leaked the transcripts, and told White that the reporters are the only ones who know who did. White ordered the two to testify on Aug. 15.

The criminal conduct being investigated in the Bonds leak case includes possible perjury and obstruction of justice by government officials, defendants in the BALCO probe and their attorneys. All had access to the leaked documents but have sworn they weren't the source of the reporting by Williams and Fainaru-Wada.

In August, White ruled his hands were tied by a 1972 Supreme Court precedent that said no one -- journalists included -- was above the law and may refuse to testify before a federal grand jury.

The Chronicle reported that Bonds told the grand jury that he believed he was using flaxseed oil and arthritic balm, not steroids, supplied by trainer Greg Anderson, one of five defendants convicted in the BALCO scandal.

Anderson served his three months and is behind bars again for refusing to testify before another federal grand jury investigating whether Bonds committed perjury when he gave that testimony in the BALCO case.

Williams and Fainaru-Wada are the latest reporters ordered to prison for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury investigating government leaks. Judith Miller, a reporter for The New York Times, was jailed for 85 days last year for refusing to testify in an investigation into the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's name.
 

Snitch hater
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
9,560
Tokens
What's fucked up about it? They got their info illegally. They had a choice to rat out who they got it from or take the fall for their actions. They did the right thing. Snitching is for punks
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
Why? Are they doing this to themselves?

They must be afraid of something worse than jail with their source.

And anderson similar charge, that makes 3 of them afraid to speak up.
 

I'm all about low expectations
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
7,210
Tokens
i would imagine they are being paid quite well for their decision by someone...
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
I believe the press is exempt from revealing their sources. However, reporters have been taken to court before. I'm not sure if any have ever served time. Notice that this says "pending appeals". Many a newspaper has paid for bail for their reporters in cases like this just out of principle.

In Arizona a few years ago there was a man who was lighting fires in large houses. He said they were encroaching on the desert. He agreed to meet with a report of the Phoenix New Times newspaper and was interviewed. The courts tried to get the reporter to tell them who he was but the reporter refused stating that he was exempt.

I'll try to find more on the law.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
That is a great question, the loyalty here is eye opening or like Funk says are they being threatened, what are they hiding? Is it money?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
9,850
Tokens
my thought is that this puts a new spin on "Freedom of the press?"

What exactly is Freedom of the press, or what does/did it mean.........
 

Snitch hater
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
9,560
Tokens
skoda said:
my thought is that this puts a new spin on "Freedom of the press?"

What exactly is Freedom of the press, or what does/did it mean.........

It doesn't mean that grand juries or gov officials are able to leak confidential information. These reporters had an easy choice of divulging who gave them this info or not.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2004
Messages
2,553
Tokens
quantumleap said:
I believe the press is exempt from revealing their sources. However, reporters have been taken to court before. I'm not sure if any have ever served time. Notice that this says "pending appeals". Many a newspaper has paid for bail for their reporters in cases like this just out of principle.

In Arizona a few years ago there was a man who was lighting fires in large houses. He said they were encroaching on the desert. He agreed to meet with a report of the Phoenix New Times newspaper and was interviewed. The courts tried to get the reporter to tell them who he was but the reporter refused stating that he was exempt.

I'll try to find more on the law.

According to the article in the OP, a 1972 Supreme Court decision says no one even the press is exempt from a Federal Grand Jury.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
bigplay said:
According to the article in the OP, a 1972 Supreme Court decision says no one even the press is exempt from a Federal Grand Jury.

I didn't read this closely enough the first time. This isn't a case of newspapers writing an article about a criminal admitting to a crime. This is a case of reporters writing an article/book about Grand Jury evidence that was leaked. I'm not sure that fits in the same category as a criminal admitting to a crime.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,582
Messages
13,452,593
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com