noway dude
USC -21.5 according to the great railbird....
usc 56
ohiost 17 im guessing is his prediction
LMFAO!!!!
rail knows his shit on a lot of topics...i wont argue with that.. but he comes off looking like an ASS on many occassions with his west coast bias ALL the time....
im guessing he probably thinks the 9ers are one of the top 5 rated teams in the NFL as well...i got news for him THE AFC WILL MOP THE FLOOR WITH ANY NFC TEAM....sit back and digest that for a few minutes.....
USC -21.5 according to the great railbird....
usc 56
ohiost 17 im guessing is his prediction
LMFAO!!!!
rail knows his shit on a lot of topics...i wont argue with that.. but he comes off looking like an ASS on many occassions with his west coast bias ALL the time....
im guessing he probably thinks the 9ers are one of the top 5 rated teams in the NFL as well...i got news for him THE AFC WILL MOP THE FLOOR WITH ANY NFC TEAM....sit back and digest that for a few minutes.....
uppy:There is not one team in the country that could beat OSU. I'm not saying OSU blows out any team, but as for straight up winning, nobody can beat them. USC can't put together a first half, OSU would be up by 20 by halftime and then run it down their throats in the second. Lets see, Auburn? I'm not even going to justify that with an explaination. I really like Louisville, but they don't have the D to hang in with Ohio State. Michigan will play them tough but OSU is more rounded. Take it to the bank, OSU goes undefeated and dominates the national championship.
whats fact is ohio st held pennst to SIX...sleptwalked thru the game and still covered in an OBVIOUS look ahead situation...in what is another huge ROAD contest...
they have played 2 top15 on the road in the last month and up to this point throttled both of them (one being #2 at the time)
if you cant tell distinguish (sp?) what a look ahead game is you shouldnt be betting on football....stick to something like baseball...where you play everyday and could give up 10 in the bottom of the 9th to lose and still come out the next day like its no big deal....
this team has been nothing short of dominating this year and is the rightful overwhelming favorite to win the NC....
they have played 2 top15 on the road in the last month and up to this point throttled both of them (one being #2 at the time)
if you cant tell distinguish (sp?) what a look ahead game is you shouldnt be betting on football....stick to something like baseball...where you play everyday and could give up 10 in the bottom of the 9th to lose and still come out the next day like its no big deal....
this team has been nothing short of dominating this year and is the rightful overwhelming favorite to win the NC....
dmmd98 said:
Biases? Against collecting money? You go ahead and bet on USC. There are no biases here. USC is maybe deserving of a top 1o ranking. Nothing more, and I'm not even sure that high. It took about 10 calls in their favor for them to get by the same WSU team that snuck by Baylor and got mopped by Auburn.
No bias my friend, the truth
in reality ohiost has faced 2 teams SUPERBOWLS in the 1st month of the season ON THE ROAD....that was texas' biggest game as they knew if they win they have clear sailing to the NC game...iowa as fishead had already stated in his post...is BEYOND sane at this point...that crowd was in a frenze (sp?) before the game...just another walk in the park for ohiost though....
EveryGamblersDream said:
They played in two beehive environments on the road with the gameday crew there to motivate the opponent in Super Bowl atmospheres. USC has played and beaten who? (Nebraska who needed OT at home to get by Kansas, and Arkansas team that snuck by Vandy, and Arizona team getting whupped at home by UW, and WSU who Auburn thrashed). USC needed a gazillion calls just to win tonight, and anyone who objectively watched the game saw just what I am talking about.
whormoan said:
Why are you doing what most refer to as daisy chaining? If you are going to do this lets look at who Ohio St beat.
They beat an overrated Texas squad.
They beat Cincy, a middle of the road Big East team.
They were average in beating Penn St, a team who got whipped by ND, beat up Northwestern who is obviously down this year.
Tonight they beat up on an overrated Iowa team who I said for awhile now were frauds. They did not dominate Montana although the score says otherwise. This same Iowa team which has more talent compared to Syracuse almost lost. I know they were without Tate but still they should have dominated them.
I'm sorry but you are picking & choosing what to point out about the teams each has beaten so far.
