Which state will have legal sports betting next?

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
4,066
Tokens
The only positive that I can see from making online gambling illegal, is that within the next couple of years you will see one or several states legalize sports betting.
I know in New York and New Jersey it has been talked about as a huge source of revenue for the state. Now that Pennsylvania has legalized slots at horse tracks to stem the flow of PA dollars to the neighboring states, NY, NJ and WV are all contemplating legalizing sports betting.
Would love to be able to go to a sportsbook here.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
4,066
Tokens
I wonder if they will have crappy odds like they do fo their lottery? 3 team parlays paying 4-1, 20% juice?
 

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Messages
4,398
Tokens
The one that should do it is WV. Talk about a state that needs revenue.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
Delaware
They are grandfathered in with Nevada to allow it under federal law.
Nobody knows.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,365
Tokens
Whoson1st said:
Delaware
They are grandfathered in with Nevada to allow it under federal law.
Nobody knows.

Oregon is also grandfathered in and currently has betting on the NFL through the lottery but will discontiue it after this year due to pressure from the NCAA which said till it is gone they won't hold any NCAA playoff games in Oregon.

:cryingcry
 

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
4,066
Tokens
jwunderdog said:
The one that should do it is WV. Talk about a state that needs revenue.

I've actually heard that WV was considering it as they were one of the first to have slots at racetracks. Now that the neighboring states will have slots, they want to regain their edge.
 

WVU

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2000
Messages
11,648
Tokens
Lets Goooooooooooo Mountaineers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,365
Tokens
Captain Carl said:
I've actually heard that WV was considering it as they were one of the first to have slots at racetracks. Now that the neighboring states will have slots, they want to regain their edge.

They would need the feds to change the current law and at this time I just don't see it happening,I would make Delaware the favorite if it ever happens.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
4,066
Tokens
The ideal way to get around it, would be to have it horse racing tracks, since they were able to get slots into them, you would have to think they could get sports gambling, a natural fit.
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
The federal law against sports gambling is unconstitutional - even the feds admit that gambling is to be state regulated.

Any state that wants sports gambling could get it oked by the feds.

More easily though they can just put it on an indian reservation.

-Sean
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
I hope Idaho...but if not im only 30 miles from the oregon border and they are trying to get a indian casino up there which will be GREAT ...now I have to go 2.5 hrs by car to Jackpot NV to gamble which is right over the border
 

W-R-X Champion
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
17,101
Tokens
What the US could do is allow citizens to keep money in Nevada accounts and bet with it from anywhere.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
528
Tokens
Dubpoet said:
What the US could do is allow citizens to keep money in Nevada accounts and bet with it from anywhere.

that one, unfortunately, is clearly illegal. I'D LOVE it if it weren't, but it is expressly prohibited to gamble across state lines. That one is enforced, so you wan't see so much as a peep of it.

Intrastate gambling systems are AOK though, so you can at least gamble from home in any state that does do this.
 

Tom Ace, Pet Detective
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
753
Tokens
The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is gonna make sportsbooking in any state hard to get done. There a few exceptions (see above) and it is a state's right, it will probably never happen.
:cryingcry
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
9,017
Tokens
any commonwealth state i figure .
hey look at the money the states would get. 10% to start
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,523
Tokens
North Dakota. This guy is writing bills, trying to get it legalized and thinks the Frist's bill is a joke. I love the last line. Good read.




[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]September 15, 2006
[SIZE=+0]North Dakota a Gambling Haven?[/SIZE]
By Roy Mark [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]<!--content_start-->
Outside the Beltway, way out there in flyover land on the prairies of North Dakota, not all Republicans are lining up to support U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's call to ban Internet gambling.

In fact, North Dakota State Rep. Jim Kasper says, "My fellow Republicans just don't get it" when it comes to Internet gambling.

In July, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, which updates the 1961 Wire Act banning sports wagering over the telephone to include all forms of online gambling.

Frist (R-Tenn.) wants the Senate to approve the same legislation in the waning days of the 109th Congress.

Kasper calls the proposal "ridiculous."

"The people of our nation want to do what they want to do in the privacy of their living rooms," Kasper told internetnews.com.

Contrary to the intent of his national party leaders, North Dakota will become a safe harbor for Internet poker players worldwide if Kasper has his way.

Kasper plans to introduce bills in the next session of the North Dakota legislature legalizing Internet poker for online casinos that will bring their software, hardware and employees to North Dakota.

The proposal is strictly limited to online poker in hopes of avoiding the controversy swirling around sports betting on the Internet.
The casinos will have to use North Dakota's state-owned bank as a measure to protect gamblers' money and safeguard against money laundering.

Software mandates, Kasper claims, will provide age-verification protections and allow the state to monitor for individuals exhibiting addictive behavior.

In return for North Dakota sanctioning and regulating online poker, casino operators will pay taxes on gross revenues that will be used to reduce property taxes.

"[The casinos] will be able to do business worldwide except where it is expressly prohibited," he said. "These are computer-based companies that provide an Internet service."

And the federal government should "keep its nose out of it. Gambling is a states' rights issue. Congress shouldn't be regulating it."

Kasper contends Congress has the right to prevent crime but not to stop online Texas Hold'em sessions.

North Dakota, he said, should be allowed to tap into the "tremendous revenue stream leaving our nation."

Even under the U.S. House legislation, state-sanctioned online gambling on horse racing and lotteries is permitted.

For Kasper, this will be his second time trying to convince his fellow North Dakota lawmakers to see it his way.

In 2005, his proposal passed -- barely -- in the state house before overwhelmingly failing in the state Senate.

Kasper said he was forced to fold his legislative hand when the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) "unfairly" interfered in North Dakota's legislative process.

"The DoJ wrote what I call a 'poison pill' letter [to North Dakota's attorney general]," he said. "It had misinformation about the Wire Act, implying it applies to all Internet gambling."

If it does, Kasper wants to know why the House felt compelled to pass legislation extending the Wire Act to Internet gambling.

"The Wire Act was specifically written to prohibit sports wagering over the telephone," he said.

When the North Dakota attorney general publicly released the letter, Kasper said he was "unable to successfully battle the DoJ."

Even if Frist is able to maneuver the House bill through the Senate and President Bush signs the legislation expanding the Wire Act to Internet gaming, Kasper swears he will crack open a fresh deck and still introduce his bill.
"I believe in a court of law we'll win," he said. "People don't want the Internet police in their living rooms."


Did anyone catch the DOJ poison pill? Amazing how all these agencies are locked in the same goosestep.


Best Wishes...OF :howdy:
[/SIZE][/FONT]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
6
Tokens
Not Likely

Given the NCAA's stance on gambling (remember the point shaving scandal in Arizona a few years ago) and the issue professional sports seems to have with gambling, it would be highly unlikely that any state would try to approach the feds on the issue of legalized sports betting.

The issue of trying to open up a sports betting account in Nevada and wager across state lines always comes up (i'm in NV), and that's illegal under state and federal law, so that avenue is closed.

I suspect that the next step the feds will do is to amend the 1961 Wire Act to expressly prohibit wagering via the internet (of course, the GOP now has it's own headache with Mark Foley and his pornographic emails to worry about).

just my 25 cents worth
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,632
Messages
13,453,075
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com