Obviously some of the good books take a stance on a game and try to attract wagering on one side of a game. Pinnacle is the master at this. Here is my question however:
What if every book had a line at -2.5 points (and this was -110)
Another book, such as pinnacle, offers the same team -2 points. HOWEVER, they have it as (-115). Considering their nickle juice this makes the other side (+105)
NOW, which side are they baiting for in this scenario? If you wanted to take the favorite in this game would you rather have:
-2.5 (-110)
or
-2 (-115)
If you wanted the underdog would you rather have:
-2.5 (-110)
or
-2 (+105)
What if every book had a line at -2.5 points (and this was -110)
Another book, such as pinnacle, offers the same team -2 points. HOWEVER, they have it as (-115). Considering their nickle juice this makes the other side (+105)
NOW, which side are they baiting for in this scenario? If you wanted to take the favorite in this game would you rather have:
-2.5 (-110)
or
-2 (-115)
If you wanted the underdog would you rather have:
-2.5 (-110)
or
-2 (+105)