I truly Believe that ONLINE GAMBLERS had something to say in these house/senate races

Search

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
I think the vote of online gamblers had a foot in these close races


especially in the Leech nut job ousting... We will never know how many of us voted but I think its alot more then some might think


At least now Bush will have a check and balance on him so he can not RULE with an iron fist all the time :suomi:
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Definetly a factor, as I know many online gamblers personally that would not have even voted(or would have voted Republican) if not for the new law just passed that hopes to hamper FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS from doing money transfers in and out from offshore sportsbooks and pokerrooms.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,773
Tokens
you kids know that the eskimo/native american vote outnumbers the gambling vote?
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Baloney,

40 Million people gamble online and that is probably a conservative number.

About 60 million people vote. If even 20% of the gamblers got out there and voted, it had an effect.

Don't believe me? Ask Frist and Leach what they think now.

Haha Leach - I started a new job today and I can still gamble. You lost one - sucker.

Sean
 

New member
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
855
Tokens
i think some gamblers had something to with it, but it was more people vote against Bush and republicans
 

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
971
Tokens
Dante, your observation of online gamblers in the bar seemed very true, sir. I tend to think that most of online gamblers are either unaware or could not care less about the new law and that is why it was a non-factor.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,760
Tokens
Where has everyone been getting this 40 million Americans that gamble online from? I decided to take a look at some numbers to try and see if it's a reasonable estimate. According to the 2000 Census, there about 281 million people in America. Let's make some assumptions that will make calculations a little easier.

- People from 0-15 years old aren't gambling online. Yes, I know of teens that are playing online poker and such, but only the 18 and 19 year olds can vote.

- People over 65 years old by and large aren't connected to the internet, let along gambling. Again there are outliers in every subset, but they comprise an insignificant portion of the online gambling world.

- The online gambling community tends to be skewed heavily towards males. I will work on an assumption that of all possible women in the age demo from 15-65 that 5% gamble online which is an overly generous estimate.

In the 15-65 demographic there were 186,176,778 people. Take that and halve it to give you the approximate male population and add 5% of that halved figure to give you approximately how many females are gambling online.

After doing that, you're left with about 97m possible people who will be gambling online. Of that, some are estimating that 40m are actively wagering? Almost 50% of the target market? 40m seems like a very high estimate to me.

When you get a more realistic number and then disburse them around the country into congressional districts and such, assuming even full turnout from all gamblers (which we know isn't the case), I'm still not convinced that the gamblers had much impact.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,723
Tokens
sean1 said:
Baloney,

40 Million people gamble online and that is probably a conservative number.

About 60 million people vote. If even 20% of the gamblers got out there and voted, it had an effect.

Don't believe me? Ask Frist and Leach what they think now.

Haha Leach - I started a new job today and I can still gamble. You lost one - sucker.

Sean

So one out of every 6 people in the country gamble online? What are you smoking.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
Dante get over yourself. We as a group are not that important to the politicians. That's just fool's gold to think that. That'sa like thinking Rutgers has a chance on Thursday.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,954
Tokens
Many of the seats the dems picked up were won by just 1% or 2%. Online gamers could have made the difference there.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
guitarjosh said:
Many of the seats the dems picked up were won by just 1% or 2%. Online gamers could have made the difference there.
Good point. That is very possible. I'm sure they wouldnt say that on an exit poll though, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
182
Tokens
Labeeb said:
- The online gambling community tends to be skewed heavily towards males. I will work on an assumption that of all possible women in the age demo from 15-65 that 5% gamble online which is an overly generous estimate.

I remember reading something on this point about 3 years ago that a large percentage of women play on the internet. This may not be true in the sportsbook but it is in the casinos.
 

......................... ...
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
1,073
Tokens
I disagree...I don't think it made any difference. Do you think that those who voted Gop over the years are going to cross over solely because of this LITTLE (in the scheme of this country's problems)issue? The only ones who would take it that far would be the degenerates. And how many of them vote on a college football game night,lol????
While i love what has happened it had zero to do with the offshore gambling issue.
 

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
Data said:
Dante, your observation of online gamblers in the bar seemed very true, sir. I tend to think that most of online gamblers are either unaware or could not care less about the new law and that is why it was a non-factor.


WOW very impressive actually sounds like Data.... good stuff :suomi: he was my fav character
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Congress quotes 40 million people gamble online. THey probably mean in their lifetime.

I would guess active gamblers is closer to 10 or 20 million.

About 80% of people have placed a bet in their lifetime.

Ask around the office sometime - you'll be surprised who has gambled online. Frankly, I dont think I know anyone under 50 who has not bet online at least once.

Sean
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
22,529
Tokens
sean1 said:
Congress quotes 40 million people gamble online. THey probably mean in their lifetime.

I would guess active gamblers is closer to 10 or 20 million.

About 80% of people have placed a bet in their lifetime.

Ask around the office sometime - you'll be surprised who has gambled online. Frankly, I dont think I know anyone under 50 who has not bet online at least once.

Sean

i just listed 50 people I know under 50 on a sheet .

Im not 100% sure in all cases but I get 9 who have gambled on line.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
557
Tokens
I think it did contribute to the anti-Republican momentum. Many high profile columnists and pundits, such as George Will, wrote about what a silly law it was. So even if people weren't gamblers, the perception was that Republicans wanted to regulate behavior. They were the true "nanny-state" party.

When it's made that clear, Americans will vote against.
 

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
15,349
Tokens
welcomeheadshot.jpg

Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum
(Who lives in Virginia by the way)


:howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy: :howdy:


:party: :party: :party:


:pope: :pope: :pope:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,251
Messages
13,449,941
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com