My Betting Manifesto

Search

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
4,847
Tokens
Just wanted to offer a different bettors point of view as to how I approach a season. I have learned from some seasoned veteran bettors, and I have prescribed to this method.

My Goal: Double my bankroll in a season.

1. Establish a bankroll.
2. Flat Bet
3. Reduced juice books/exchanges are a must

Here is how it works. Once a bankroll is established you must be consistent. No doubling up, no chasing 2nd half plays. None of that. This is a business and you are investing, just like the stock market, just like any business does. I don't bet on games because they are on TV, I bet on them because I believe I have greater than a 50% chance of winning. Anytime you have grasp of an edge greater than 50%, then your in business.

Flat betting is key. We all know how it works, the game you put the least on wins and the game you put the most on loses. Your record stands at 1-1, but you are down money. The idea of parlays, teasers to me are sucker bets, just in a different form. There is always one game you teased the wrong way and the last leg of your parlay loses. It has happened to the majority of bettors. Simply put, the average bettor is looking to make X-Dollars today, while I am looking at making X-Dollars over the course of a season. Would you rather make $1k tonight or $10k within a 90 day period? The choice is pretty obvious to me. Here is where Reduced Juice comes into play.

Reduced juice books/exchanges allow even the average bettor to maximize their profits even their losses. Lets compare.

2% -- 10%
Starting bankroll $100k
Record (58%) 58-42 -- 58-42
Win $ at 10k per $580,000 -- $580,000
Loss $ at 10k per $428,000 -- $462,000
Profit $151, 000 -- $118,000


That is the difference right there. If you can go 58% there is a monumental difference in profits when you have reduced juice, so much so that you would have to go 60% at 10% juice just to match it. I realize that this is a very aggressive way to approach this and that if you go 0-10 you are done, but this is the most sound way to go about reaching an aggressive investment goal.

The average bettor who loses their shirt every week will tell you that the "house" has the edge and that you cannot make money sports betting, but I have shown above that with a $100k bankroll, hitting at only a 58% clip you make $151,000 profit. Not bad for doing what you love.

The example above is more for a comparison on juice and to show how much getting the lowest possible vig is crucial. Lets break the system down in its most simple form.

$100k bankroll
1 unit = 10%
10% = $10k
The Goal = +10 units
+10 units = 100% profit

This is why you flat bet. Wager the same amount on every play and once you have reached the goal you have doubled your bankroll. You now have the option to set a new goal or just cash out for the season. This is entirely up to the individual bettor based on his confidence level.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Treat your BR as if it were a 401K plan.

Nice presentation here, thanks for sharing.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
Why wouldnt you give credit to me for that austin?

Its mine word for word....

:think2:
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
28,775
Tokens
"1 unit = 10%"

Dangerous....Overly aggressive & a good way to lose it all
 

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
4,847
Tokens
Hey I didn't know you posted here. I hinted at it in seasoned vet bettor.

This is something is an article that vanzack posted at another site, and I just was curious how some view this.

Van - has your email changed? I have tried to email ya, but never heard back.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
TTinCO said:
"1 unit = 10%"

Dangerous....Overly aggressive & a good way to lose it all

Can't remember wagering this much on a game.......if ever.

I rarely wager over 1% of my BR on one game.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
austintx05 said:
Hey I didn't know you posted here. I hinted at it in seasoned vet bettor.

This is something is an article that vanzack posted at another site, and I just was curious how some view this.

Van - has your email changed? I have tried to email ya, but never heard back.

No its still the same - maybe it went in to the dreaded bulk folder. I never check that.

Try it again - you know I always respond.

:toast:
 

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
4,847
Tokens
See thats the only reason I wanted to post this. Just a discussion as to why some prefer the 2-3% per unit and why some prefer a 7-10% per unit method.

Vanzack - I always enjoyed reading your posts and I have learned a great deal from you. I hope you do not take offense that I posted this here.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
TTinCO said:
"1 unit = 10%"

Dangerous....Overly aggressive & a good way to lose it all

I understand this point.

But these percentages do not exist in a vacuum - they are guided by the other factors in this closed system.

IF - and that is a big IF - all of the other factors in this system calculate that you need to bet 10% in order to reach your goal - then you MUST BET 10%. Its simple math. If 10% is too much for you, then one or all of the other factors must be manipulated.

The reason that I originally spelled all of this out is because the average bettor wants to triple their money in 2 weeks, and bet 2% on each bet, and only bet 10 games. This is impossible. It doesnt add up.

It was an excercise to show that most gamblers never take the time to come up with the calculating factors and would have no clue how to get to a goal.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Impossible to survive wagering 10% of a BR on ONE game.

10-12 losses in a row and broke..........no?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
austintx05 said:
See thats the only reason I wanted to post this. Just a discussion as to why some prefer the 2-3% per unit and why some prefer a 7-10% per unit method.

Vanzack - I always enjoyed reading your posts and I have learned a great deal from you. I hope you do not take offense that I posted this here.

Not at all dude. Just thought I was having deja vu reading it because it is my writing.

:toast:
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
Fishhead said:
Impossible to survive wagering 10% of a BR on ONE game.

10-12 losses in a row and broke..........no?

Agreed. But once again, you cant look at this inside of a vacuum.

If someone said to you "I want to double my money today on 1 bet - how could I do that"? The answer is simply to put the whole bankroll on one game.

If someone goes down the checklist of factors listed above and the calculations say you have to bet 10%, then you have to bet 10%. Yes the volatility is greater and yes the chances of going broke are much higher - but the chances of hitting your goal are also higher than using a 2% model. Its simple mathmatics.

But its simplicity is what most gamblers never analyze. They never ask "what is my goal" or "how much should I be betting". It is usually a haphazard excercise that ends badly because it is chaotic in nature.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
vanzack said:
Agreed. But once again, you cant look at this inside of a vacuum.

If someone said to you "I want to double my money today on 1 bet - how could I do that"? The answer is simply to put the whole bankroll on one game.

If someone goes down the checklist of factors listed above and the calculations say you have to bet 10%, then you have to bet 10%. Yes the volatility is greater and yes the chances of going broke are much higher - but the chances of hitting your goal are also higher than using a 2% model. Its simple mathmatics.

But its simplicity is what most gamblers never analyze. They never ask "what is my goal" or "how much should I be betting". It is usually a haphazard excercise that ends badly because it is chaotic in nature.

Very confused by your post here.

In theory it is faster to double a BR by playing RED on the roulette table, as it only takes a few seconds, so therefore why wager a game?

Seems like a theory based on your writings.

Been in and around this business a long time, and have seen so many gamblers go broke, committ suicide, be depressed, etc., etc..........that I can only say that a conservative approach is the best offensive plan of attack for well over 95% of gamblers.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Anyone betting 10% a play is nuts. The risk of ruin is sky high. Even 5% is suicide. As you point out you play after you are above 50% chance of winning. If you have say 54% chance of winning a bet, that implies your edge is somewhere around 8% minus juice, lets say you bet at -105. You're edge is about 5.5%. Plenty of math has been done for gamblers to show if you bet more than your edge your net profit over time must be lower. This concept is hard to grasp, but the bottom line is if you overbet your chances of going broke go up by an exponential factor and therefore your long run results go down because you are broke too much of the time.

Its not a bad manifesto, but put in 2% or less for the bets and then you are onto something sustainable and good.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
4,847
Tokens
I will say that I wagered in this manner for this college football season, but I only wagered on 28 games. I am very selective as I went 21-7 on the year. I realize that some like to play several games per week, but this is how I bet.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Think about this...........if one can/could select 58% winners(HIGHLY UNLIKELY BY THE WAY), how many 10+ game losing streaks on average would they have encountered after playing 2,000 games?

Hope you know the answer to this question.

Again, this is IF they can even hit 58%.............which again is HIGHLY UNLIKELY in betting the pointspread in BASKETS and FOOTBALL.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
Fishhead said:
Very confused by your post here.

In theory it is faster to double a BR by playing RED on the roulette table, as it only takes a few seconds, so therefore why wager a game?

Seems like a theory based on your writings.

Been in and around this business a long time, and have seen so many gamblers go broke, committ suicide, be depressed, etc., etc..........that I can only say that a conservative approach is the best offensive plan of attack for well over 95% of gamblers.

Im not saying that conservative is not the way to go!

I am saying that you cant double your money on one game by being conservative. It is a contradiction of terms.

Its fairly simple. Can you come up with these factors:

1. Goal
2. Timeframe for goal
3. Handicappng percentage
4. Total number of games in that timeperiod that you can bet at your percentage
5. Juice percentage
6. Starting bankroll

At that point it is simple math. Im not suggesting or telling you what your goal should be but if your factors look like the following there is no way you could advise this guy to bet 3% per game:

1. Goal (double bankroll)
2. Timeframe for goal (1 week)
3. Handicappng percentage (60%)
4. Total number of games in that timeperiod that you can bet at your percentage (10)
5. Juice percentage (10%)
6. Starting bankroll ($1,000)

Its just simple math that most gamblers never take the time to figure out. They take a chaotic approach and throw stuff at the wall and hope it sticks.

This is a systematic approach to quantifying just what it takes to attain your goal and then you can decide if it is right for you or not.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
917
Tokens
Jesus guys just think for a second. Read what I posted.

ONCE AGAIN LET ME REITERATE THAT I AM NOT ADVOCATING BETTING 10% PER GAME!!!

I am simply telling you something that might be hard to hear. The average gamblers goals and expectations are out of whack with their willingness for risk!! REREAD THAT.

Its simple math.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
These are good things to live by, but if your numbers are out of whack you are better off doing something else. Written goals get achieved, no question about that. But just because you write down something impossible doesn't mean it will get achieved.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,276
Messages
13,450,156
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com