sean1 said:
Better question is why when the Colts offered 3.5$/year and the Pats had offered $2.5 to Vinitieri did the Pats not match? Adam wanted to stay in NE and NE was $12M under the cap.
Worst free agent blunder in the history of the NFL. The guy won you two superbowls!!! And you let him go over $1M
Sean
Sean1-
The Pats have a business philosophy for free agent signings. They NEVER set the market for a certain position. Signing Adam to $3.5 mill/season would be setting the market, and breaking a league record for a kicker salary.
Yes- Adam is the most clutcher kicker in history. But he's getting on w/ age & there were concerns about his back problems. Paying him for past performances is just not something they wanted to do.
They also had a chance to franchise him...but that would be the third time, they would do so. So, the Pats did a nice gesture and let him hit the free agent market for a good chunk of change.
This is a business philosophy that has won three Super Bowls...they won't change, period. (ie: wide receiver situation w/ Branch).
And NOBODY has gone from the Patriots to another team and has excelled better than they did on the Patriots...the only ones so far, have basically been Greg Spires. Damien Woody, Lawyer Milloy, Joe Andruzzi, David Patten, Christian Fauria, Willie McGinest, Ted Washington, etc etc the list goes on and on have dropped considerally.
As a huge Pats fan...I trust EVERY business decision they make...there isnt an example that has proved them wrong.