Agree 100 % Reason ? A big part of the home court advantage is not only the crowds but also the way the Refs are influenced by the crowds. Baseball calls are so cut and dry for the most part that the Refs really don't influence the game all that much. If a guy hits the ball over the fence.... It's a home run ... the only real advantage maybe is balls and strikes and they are graded on that.mike0187 said:baseball
Very compelling argument ! However there is some consideration to the fact that baseball has reached more parity and there aren,t as many worthless teams as there used to be. Also you are taking last years stats in which no team in either leaugue won fewer than 61 games showing more parity. Let's go back a few years when baseball wasn't so even and you will get much different stats. In 2004 there were 12 teams with losing records at home in mlb !X-Files said:NHL: 4 of 30 teams had losing records at home in the 2005-2006 season
NBA: 6 of 30 in 2005-2006
MLB: 6 of 30 teams in 2005-2006
NFL: 9 of 32 in 2005-2006
NFL is the worst.
Nobody said home field advantage meant nothing. The question was in which sport it means the least.Good question... no easy answers !lander said:Let's cut through the crap - last out in baseball clearly means something.
Last season for MLB only 6 teams has losing records at home - Bal 40-41, KC 34-47, Tex 39-42, Atl 40-41, Cubs 46-45 and Arz 39-42.
Home teams won 200+ more games than they lost.
ppeter said:How can it not be NBA.
The dimensions of the court and rim are the same, and who the fvck cares how loud the crowd gets. Its not like they are drowning out playcalling and causing false starts or anyting.