Interesting concept here, wondering what others would do. An article with 5 selections on another site has gone 0-4 so far, with a couple of the picks being a complete 180 from actual results (ie. he picked Rangers to win 5-2 while they are losing 8-2). So for the final game on the slate, would you all be inclined to back the play figuring regression to the mean or bet against it figuring it just isn't his day? Just looking for opinions on how others would proceed.
Would pass.
If poster has five plays, would have probably faded all 5, but to just fade one or some of the card screws things up.
Instead of going 4-1 at worst or 5-0 at best, now youre looking at possibly going 0-1 and losing money when you could have been in the profits automatically fading the entire card from the get.
Then if it hits, youre 1-0, when you could have been 4-1.
If poster has five plays, would have probably faded all 5, but to just fade one or some of the card screws things up.
Instead of going 4-1 at worst or 5-0 at best, now youre looking at possibly going 0-1 and losing money when you could have been in the profits automatically fading the entire card from the get.
Then if it hits, youre 1-0, when you could have been 4-1.
