2 MVPs?

primetime21+ · Jan 9, 2007

what am i missing here?

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

I think they just gave co-MVP's out. I don't know whether I win, lose or push with the field. i knew they'd do something weird here.

primetime21+ · Jan 9, 2007

Books must be scrambling to figure this one out and i expect people to complain one way or the other.

Bennyshoe · Jan 9, 2007

wonder how Pinny will grade this one

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

I believe the correct payout would be half the price of Leak, and half the price for the field.

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

Bennyshoe said:
wonder how Pinny will grade this one

Pinny graded Leak the winner, but I'm not buying it. I think I've got something coming for the field. The PROP didn't specify OFFENSIVE MVP. It just said "MVP".

Santo · Jan 9, 2007

Anti-liberal said:
I believe the correct payout would be half the price of Leak, and half the price for the field.

This would seem logical. "Dead heat" rules.

theticket_22 · Jan 9, 2007

pinny just changed my field bet to cancelled no action...but my frind had tebow and its graded loser...so i guess since field and leak won mvp they pushed both of those....

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

I'm currently in litigation with Pinny on it. Does anyone have a source naming these two as the MVPs?

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

theticket_22 said:
pinny just changed my field bet to cancelled no action...but my frind had tebow and its graded loser...so i guess since field and leak won mvp they pushed both of those....

But they can't push the two co-MVPs and keep the losing bets also. It's like a dead-heat in a horse-race, as Santo mentioned.

Co-MVP's...at what point will the political correctness stop?

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

They ended up giving a refund, but I think bets on Leak and the field should've got a split price, dead-heat style.

D2bets · Jan 9, 2007

I can't believe there isn't/wasn't pre-determined rules for this. Can't be that hard to imagine happening.

lifexpired · Jan 9, 2007

So they took all losing bets and pushed the Leak and field bets??? What??? Robbery if this is the case

D2bets · Jan 9, 2007

lifexpired said:
So they took all losing bets and pushed the Leak and field bets??? What??? Robbery if this is the case

Good point. Yes, that is inherently inconsistent. That cannot stand. Does Pinnacle really not have any rule covering this sort of thing in any context?

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

theticket_22 said:
pinny just changed my field bet to cancelled no action...but my frind had tebow and its graded loser...so i guess since field and leak won mvp they pushed both of those....

Did your friend get a refund on his Tebow bet?

Someone please explain to me why this would not be graded like a dead-heat. That's the only way to correctly handle it.

theticket_22 · Jan 9, 2007

not as of late last night...

Anti-liberal · Jan 9, 2007

They shouldn't be keeping losers and pushing the co-winners. If you will, see if you can get an update on your friend's Tebow bet.

theticket_22 · Jan 9, 2007

will update as soon as they wake up.....i agree its either all bets push or a deat-heat payout.

Anti-liberal · Jan 10, 2007

I guess it ends with Pinny pushing the two co-MVP's. I don't know if they kept the losers, or made every bet a push. "any other player" at +500 to +550 was probably the worst outcome for them, so they were probably not anxious to split the prices, dead-heat style. They declined to give an explanation as to why they didn't split the prices. Maybe it's covered in their rules...I have to check. I know that any Nevada Gaming Control Board governed book in Nevada would have had to split the prices on the two co-MVP's.

NascarFan48 · Jan 10, 2007

Wow no fair

2 MVPs?

New member

Rx. Veteran

New member

New member

Rx. Veteran

Rx. Veteran

New member

RX

Rx. Veteran

Rx. Veteran

Rx. Veteran

New member

New member

New member

Rx. Veteran

RX

Rx. Veteran

RX

Rx. Veteran

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page